"Lest we forget an over the shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical...who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom -- Lucifer." Saul Alinsky
Marxist Sexual values are the tip of the Cultural Marxist spear that is poisoning our society. Cultural Marxism uses Marxist ideology to reshape basic social values. To paraphrase Herbert Marcuse one of the founders of Cultural Marxism:
the current organization of society [has] produced "surplus repression" by imposing socially unnecessary labor, unnecessary restrictions on sexuality, and a social system organized around profit and exploitation. In light of the diminution of scarcity and prospects for increased abundance, Marcuse called for the end of repression and creation of a new society.Cultural Marxists understand that in order to re-create society in their evil image, you first need to undermine the "bourgeois" values that create a successful society in the first place. In order to undermine self-reliance, Cultural Marxists use sex to sabotage the discipline necessary to delay gratification. By surrendering to your primal lusts, instead of controlling (to the best of your ability) those lusts, you undermine your own self-respect; anyone who has ever taken a walk of shame knows this. This is a deliberate form of mind control; once individuals give into chaos and disorder in their personal lives, Cultural Marxists know eventually society will give into chaos and disorder followed by tyranny. Cultural Marxists use sex as a smokescreen, a VERY tempting smokescreen, and they've been VERY successful.
Potential for sexual decadence (which, in reality, never materializes as planned) makes utopianism an easy sell. As author Lisa Fabrizio has noted the Marxist:
conception of sex is that exercise of bodily functions that exists only for the use of human beings by other human beings solely as instruments of physical pleasure; often perversely so.
Cultural Marxists understand that, once people give into basic sexual urges, you can then re-shape their values in all sorts of other ways. As just one small example, once we've made our own souls subservient to physical urges, it's a small step morally to make an unborn child's very life subservient to those same urges. Marxist values re-define sex from an act of sharing and creation into an act of selfish gratification.
Cultural Marxists redefine freedom by confusing liberty and license. Actions have consequences; traditional Western values believe you should be free to engage in the actions you choose so long as you're prepared to accept the consequences. Marxists pervert that definition of freedom into one where you're encouraged to engage in self-destructive actions and some mythical "rich" person will subsidize the consequence.
There's a vast difference between letting people make their own decisions and celebrating their worst traits. For example, should a woman choose to get gang-banged by the football team, traditional western values wouldn't stop her from engaging in that action, but they would insist that her and her family and her church bear the full cost of it's consequences. Marxists, on the other hand, would say that she's the victim of a sexist 'power structure' and is thus entitled to a "free" abortion or treatment for the ensuing STD. For the record, most women I know don't define freedom as having the government pay to have their insides scraped out by some abortionist after getting gang-banged by the football team.
These sexual decisions have very real economic consequences for society. As history teaches, once a society collapses morally, economic collapse shortly follows. As Dr. Melissa Clouthier details:
The nut of Sandra Fluke’s argument is this: pay for my contraception. If it doesn’t work, pay for my abortion. If I decide to have the kid, but not work and do something like “community organizing” or “reproductive rights activism”, pay for my lifestyle choice.
And herein lies the problem with a purely libertine argument: Someone has to pay for all this freedom.
True personal liberty comes with a lot of personal responsibility.
The way it stands now, though, feminists are pushing for the state to take care of everything. ...A truly “free” woman would pay for her choices, but the fact is, that these choices can all be very expensive.Simply put, subsidizing the consequences of bad sexual decisions for everyone in society will undermine the individual personality traits that allows a productive economy to exist in the first place.
Marxists claim they're the descendents of the Summer of Love and Woodstock. That's true. What Marxists fail to mention is that, just as night follows day, Altamont, Kent State, and Roe v. Wade are the inevitable consequences of the Summer of Love and Woodstock. The sexual revolution lead to dramatic increases in abortion, divorce and illegitimacy; none of that is good. Sex always has consequences, both good and bad; as a society, shouldn't we seek to maximize the former and minimize the latter?!?
Morality is the character to do what you should, and a free society in the traditional sense depends on it. Sex, as anyone who's been sexually active for more than thirty seconds knows, can be either the most amazingly wonderful thing in this world, or the most terribly awful. Whether sex is amazing or terrible depends on the underlying moral framework you approach it with. As Match.com has documented married, conservative, Christians have the most and the best sex. Marxist sexual values, on the other hand, lead to really, really, REALLY bad sex. Good sex NEVER ends in a walk of shame or abortion; traditional sexual morality never necessitates "Rape Free Zones."
Marxist sexual values are the serpent, and the rest of us are Eve.
Author's Note: I wrote this piece over three sessions. During the first session, I could not help overhearing/eavesdropping on a conversation three tables down about some girl's attempt to get a cervical cancer screening via Planned Parenthood and her four month (and counting) wait time. This has to be said....