Who called it?!?

Having established this forum almost eight months ago, I'd like to review some of my calls in that time:

• Barack Obama's strategic objectives.

• Ted Cruz will win the U.S. Senate race.

• Obama wants chaos.

• Treyvon Martin was a hoax.

• Why Obama REALLY needs his political base.

• Legacy Media lied about the new Libyan government.

• Barack Obama ended Julian Castro's career.

• Erick Stackelbeck on Global Terror Trends.

• Democrats will overreact to Todd Akin.

• Sending Kira Davis to Charlotte.

• Obama's admin will attempt to release the Blind Sheikh.

Not a bad record; I've got a few others that I'm pretty sure will materialize in early November!!!

The Coming Collapse of the Race Card

Well, it's official; a Democrat-dominated panel of Federal Judges threw out Texas' voter-ID law; Governor Perry says it best:

Chalk up another victory for fraud. Federal judges subverted the will of the people of Texas and undermined our effort to ensure fair and accurate elections. The Obama Administration's claim that it's a burden to present a photo ID to vote simply defies common sense.

This ruling made my blood pressure spike, but only for ten seconds; it reeks of desperation.

The notion that, having to prove you actually are who you say you are before voting, is racist is silly. The nation's Attorney General had his ballot given away.  In reality, dishonest elections hurt minorities.

This is insulting.  In Texas, it takes 45 minutes and twenty-five dollars to get a photo-ID.  If you believe minorities are incapable of getting a photo-ID then, quite honestly, you're the racist.

This won't last much longer.  Eric Holder already helped elect Ted Cruz.  Barack Obama's pathetic re-election campaign, following the Treyvon Martin hoax, is draining the race card's potency.  Calling voter-ID laws racist won't restore it.  A year or two after Obama leaves office, the race card will be done.

On Treyvon Martin, Manufacturing Outrage, and Chaos

"The first step in community organization is community disorganization.  The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization.  Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displaced by new patterns that provide the opportunities and means for citizen participation (*).  All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new."

Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals, Page 116

*Keep in mind, for Alinsky 'Citizen Participation' is a euphemism for ginning up an angry mob.

If you haven't heard about the Treyvon Martin story this past week, you're living under a rock; something about this story stinks. 

The main thing that bugs me about this story is the speed with which it's taken off.  Over the past week, I've seen it go from obscure websites, to Think Progress and the Huffington Post, then to ABC News.  Each time the story has moved forward, it's gotten posted on more Facebook pages.  Considering everything we know about Media Matters, something doesn't add up.  I can't shake the feeling that we're at the beginning of another Tawana Brawley Yankel Rosenbaum episode.

So, what's going on and why would anyone advance something like this?!?

In Rules for Radicals, Saul Alinsky said: "Before men can act on an issue it must become polarized" (78). I've believed, for some time now, that some VERY powerful forces are deliberately sowing anger and chaos in America.  If you're looking to polarize the nation to sow anger and chaos, this story is perfect.  Consider:

• Is the story racially charged?!?  Check
• Does the story demonize gun owners?!?  Check
• Is the story friendly to straw man arguments?!?  Check
• Does the story lend itself to an easy villain?!? Check
• Is the Villain tailor made for an angry mob?!?   Good Grief, Check

Saul Alinsky's eleventh rule teaches: "Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It  and Polarize It."  George Zimmerman is the perfect demon for this sort of campaign.  Based on media reports, George Zimmerman does not seem to be a good guy.  He's easy to demonize.  This is key, because if you're looking create an escalating series of demons to gin-up anger and chaos, then the first demon has to be someone or something indefensible.  Remember, long before Barack Obama demonized Jews and Catholics, Michael Bloomberg demonized smokers.

It's an old saying, but a lie gets halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on. That's why I don't trust stories that appear out of nowhere on the internet.  A year ago, you had this phony Arab Spring take off out of nowhere on the internet, we now know that was a lie.  A month ago, you had the #PhonyKony internet video, we also know that was a lie.  This Trayvon Martin story stinks worse than those other two, and I cannot shake the feeling that it's sophistocated twenty-first century cyber-astroturf.    I've tried to start viral campaigns on the internet, and it's hard; it's a lot easier if you have powerful people helping you behind the scenes.

So, what does this all mean?!?  It's impossible to know at this point, but if the following events happened, it wouldn't surprise me:

1. Several months from now, we learn this is a massive Overton Window.
2. We start seeing gun owners demonized as racist
3. George Zimmerman ends up being the first person dragged into the streets and killed by Occupy Wall St.

Again, caution is in order, because we don't know the full facts.  But something about this case stinks.

It stinks BADLY.