Showing posts with label Giovanni Capriglione. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Giovanni Capriglione. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 4, 2019

#TXLEGE: Bonnen's "Select Committee on Mass Violence prevention" is a Rogue's Gallery


"Every one of the builders had his sword girded at his side as he built. And the one who sounded the trumpet was beside me."
Nehemiah 4:18

YIKES:

That list...pretty much speaks for itself.

A couple of these can be justified due to geography.  Specifically, Joe Moody and Cesar Blanco are from El Paso.  So those are understandable.  Likewise, Brooks Landgraf from Odessa.

Still...Poncho?!?  Julie Johnson?!?  Disproportionate Democrat representation?!?

[sarc]We're sure Chairman Drew Darby, Charlie Geren, and Giovanni Capriglione won't sell out our rights. [/sarc]

Bottom Line: That this committee has an equal number of D's and R's despite a solid R majority tells you everything you need to know.

Friday, May 10, 2019

#TXLEGE: Capriglione's Protectionist Roofing Scheme FAILS SPECTACULARLY


"Deceit is in the heart of those who devise evil,
But counselors of peace have joy."
Proverbs 12:20

[Note: You can view the full discussion of HB 2101 here.  The relevant section begins at the 3 hour, 12 minute mark.  It runs for about half an hour.]

For a bill deadline day, yesterday was fairly anticlimactic.  The Texas house passed a modestly useful constitutional amendment prohibiting a state income tax.  Otherwise, the day went how we expected.

Except, however, for one bill that failed,

HB 2101, by Giovanni Capriglione, would require mandatory registration and fees for all roofing contractors in the state.  We're actually on the mailing list for the lobbyists who were pushing this bill.  That's the only we're familiar with it.

As luck would have it, we were in the house gallery as the bill was discussed last night.

We chronicled it, real time, on Facebook:



And Twitter:


For such a wretched bill, opposition was refreshingly bipartisan.

Democrats like Ramon Romero and Abel Herrero talked about how Capriglione's bill was unfair to responsible businesses.  Steve Toth discussed how costs exploded in his industry (swimming pool services) following a similar bill by the legislature.  Matt Schaefer spoke movingly about how such regulations would have made his own economic rise impossible.

The bill failed 33 to 99.

Bottom Line: To see such a wretched elected official pushing such a wretched bill suffer this level of public humiliation was quite fun....

Monday, April 30, 2018

#atxcouncil: Kitchen goes "Full Capriglione;" stabs NIMBY base in the back....


"And [Judas] consented, and sought opportunity to betray him unto them, when the people were away."
Luke 22:6

We're not sure how we feel about last Thursday's drama surrounding the CodeNEXT petition.  We'd want to speak with some of our lawyer friends before weighing in.  And, honestly, we don't care enough about CodeNEXT at this point to ask.

But there's a separate political aspect that's fascinating: Ann Kitchen's utter, total, and complete betrayal of her NIMBY political base; the comparison to Giovanni Capriglione writes itself.....

IndyAustin has more:
But who really took the cake was Councilmember Ann Kitchen. Kitchen, if you remember, led the battle to counter 10-1 with another plan that eliminated the first independent citizens redistricting commission in Texas. She lost that one. In this case, Kitchen boldly claimed that the CodeNEXT petition is “illegal,” so much as accusing her four colleagues that they were voting for an illegal petition.
Keep in mind, this is the same Ann Kitchen who appointed the then-President of the Austin Neighborhoods Council to the Zoning and Platting commission.

It's hard to understand what Kitchen is thinking.  We've heard speculation that she's reached some sort of deal with Adler, but that's just speculation.  Furthermore, it's difficult to see what Adler can give her that's worth permanently alienating her biggest supporters. That's even truer in an election year.

Bottom Line: This was a stupid unforced error, but we'll take it....

Friday, March 2, 2018

#TXLEGE: Activists apologize for previous support of Capriglione


"He who covers his sins will not prosper,
But whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy."
Proverbs 28:13

These are great!!!

Julie McCarty:



Highlights:
  • "I'm sorry that I ever helped lead the way for Giovanni Capriglione to ever become a state representative."
  • "Gio campaigned as a conservative; we all believed his promises, myself included."
  • Had a decent record his first session, and it's been steadily downhill ever since.
  • It's not just about the speaker vote two sessions ago; Giovanni's turned his back on a lot of other things as well.
  • "We have learned a lot over the past 6 to 8 years about vetting candidates.
  • Vote Armin Mizani.



Highlights:
  • In his first campaign, Capriglione explained the psychological games the lobby plays with new conservative members. 
  • "He did exactly what he described, what he was warning about."
  • "That's why I'm out working for Armin today."



Highlights:
  • "I'm sorry that our state representative, Giovanni Capriglione, has been less than truthful to the people who put him into office six years ago."
  • Voted for granny tax.
  • Voted to preserve corporate welfare for Hollywood.



[Note: We're not going to post a "highlight" list for this final video because the visuals only work if you watch the whole thing from start to finish.  It's only four minutes.  Well worth it.]

Bottom Line: Giovanni Capriglione's political trajectory reminds us of Arnold Schwarzenegger's as Governor of California.  Lots of big talk on the campaign trail, followed by a little action in the first year, followed by falling off a cliff.  Ultimately, Schwarzenegger made the problems he originally campaigned on fixing much, much, worse.  It's not a good comparison.

Monday, January 29, 2018

#TXLEGE: Macias apologies for originally electing Capriglione....


"Judas the son of James, and Judas Iscariot who also became a traitor."
Luke 6:16

This is great, but the best part is the explanation about how the reality of the legislative process all-too-often works:



Highlights:

  • Gio's chief political strategist in 2011 and '12.
  • Held extensive coversations at the time.
  • Ran against liberal Republican Vicki Truitt.
  • Leadership tells legislators not to vote based on policy or principles, but to vote on personality.
    • Giovanni explicitly campaigned on doing the opposite.
  • "Over the past six years, I have watched [Giovanni] become everything he campaigned against [in 2012], and for that: I'm sorry."
  • Had a good session in 2013.
  • "Something happened between his freshman and sophomore year, it is one of the most severe shifts that I have ever witnesses in my entire political career."
  • "Giovanni made a decision.  He decided it was better to evaluate each and every one of the votes he takes....And instead of looking at it according to how he had told you he would vote.  Instead, he would see who the author was.  If that author was powerful.   What the chairman of the committee thought that was hearing a bill of his.  Who the leadership was lining up behind, and how that would effect his standing in the chamber."
  • That decision making model was exactly what Giovanni campaigned against in 2012.
  • Luke fired Giovanni in the summer of 2015: "I turned him down.  I told him I wouldn't work with him."
  • Giovanni paid his next consultant $28,000 next cycle.
  • Got even worse in 2017.
  • In 2012, he campaigned against accounting gimmicks in the budget.  In 2017, he worked to advance a budget full of accounting gimmicks.
  • Armin Mizani is his opponent now.

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

#TXLEGE: Notes on the Mark Jones Index....


"Therefore by their fruits you will know them."
Matthew 7:20

Mark Jones is a political science professor at Rice University.  Every odd numbered year, he produces a non partisan index that ranks the members of the Texas Legislature from left to right.  Jones' index is worth investing some time into because, while the methodology is more complicated than some other groups, it's the most comprehensive analysis of individual members of the Texas Legislature.

Texas House Results:

Note: Click on the image to enlarge.

Texas Senate Results:


In no particular order, some personal observations:
  • Freedom caucus (predictably) solidify their position as the 12 most conservative House members.
  • Kel Seliger is the most liberal Republican in the Texas Senate; over half of the Republican caucus in the House is more liberal than Seliger.
  • In the House, we would give every member from Rodney Anderson up a passing grade on voting record; that's 31 members out of a 95 member Republican caucus.
  • However, even among those 31 members with passing grades on their voting record, there are three (Drew Springer, Dennis Bonnen, and Larry Phillips) who receive automatic F's based on other shady actions; so 28 members out of a 95 member House Republican caucus ultimately receive passing grades.
  • 26 Republican House members have more liberal voting records than Byron Cook; chew on that one for a second.
  • Jason Isaac moves significantly to the right from 2015 to 2017; this is consistent with a number of observations we made during the session.
  • In the other direction, Jodie Laubenberg, James White, Giovanni Capriglione, Tan Parker, and Phil King continued their multi-session leftward drift.
  • Speaking of leftward drift, Dan Flynn is now in the bottom half of House Republicans.
  • Rafael Anchia and Chris Turner both rank significantly to the left of the average Democrat in the House...are they sure those are the two guys they want to make spokespeople for their entire party?!?
  • On the Senate side, all Republicans elected in the past 7 years are significantly to the right of the person they replaced.
    • Update: We suppose that technically Paul Bettencourt is about even with the guy he replaced in SD-7.
  • Charles Perry and Larry Taylor both have voting records to the left of Bob Nichols; while people shouldn't overreact, this is a trend worth monitoring.
  • Joan Huffman as the second most liberal Senate Republican might be flying a little too close to the sun for her own good in her re-elect cycle.
Read the full report (including a detailed discussion of methodology) for the House here and the Senate here.

Monday, August 24, 2015

Giovanni Capriglione...and Steve Bresnen?!?


"Do not be deceived: Evil company corrupts good habits.”
1 Corinthians 15:33

Steve Bresnen is a prominent Austin lobbyist.  He has longstanding ties to BINGO interests and Trial Lawyers.  As a lobbyist for the Texas Family Law Foundation, he was instrumental in killing American Laws for American Courts legislation last session.

Bresnen is also the driving force behind the Texas "Ethics" Commission's jihad against Empower Texans.

Which make this item from page 8 of Giovanni Capriglione's January 2015 campaign finance report very interesting:


Capriglione endorsed Straus's re-election as speaker on Monday, November 10th; Bresnen's donation came the following Friday.

Bottom Line: Cahnman's Musings has no beef with Steve making the donation.  On a certain level, we actually respect the chutzpah.  That being said, for Steve Bresnen to see Giovanni Capriglione as a worthwhile investment tells you everything you need to know about where the latter's bread is buttered these days.

Thursday, July 16, 2015

Observations regarding 84th #TXLEGE Scorecards


"So then each of us shall give account of himself to God."
Romans 14:12

[Author's Note: Empower Texans scorecard can be found here; CWA's can be found here; Rice University House and Senate.]

While not every scorecard covering the 84th #TXLEGE session has been released, the ones currently out begin to reveal interesting patterns.

In no particular order:
  • All three indexes confirm that the members of the House who voted for Scott Turner are the most conservative ones; while some Straus supporters were on the lower end of the conservative mix, it was the same names consistently at the top of all three.
  • On Empower's scorecard: Generally, the 'conservative when convenient' house members scored worse than they did in 2013, while the outright RINO's scored substantially better.
    • Author's note: One major difference between 2015 and 2013 is that this time the budget was scored as a positive vote whereas last time it was negative.
  • Empower: 18 Republican members of the Texas House got an 'A'; 47 Republican members (almost half the caucus) got an F.
  • Empower: By contrast, every single Republican member of the Texas Senate got a passing grade.
  • Empower: Even among the Freshmen House members who voted for Straus, the new person tended to rate substantially higher than the person they replaced; for example, while John Wray isn't our cup of Tea, his 77 is 48 points better than the disgraced Jim Pitts' 29 in 2013.
    • Exceptions to this included Will Metcalf whose 76 comes in 8 points behind Brandon Creighton's 84 in 2013 and Linda Koop whose 60 who was 30 points behind Stefani Carter's 90 (of course, Koop's election was kind of a fluke to begin with).
  • Empower: Speaking of Brandon Crieghton, he improved from an 84 in the House in 2013 to a 90 in the Senate in 2015.
  • Empower/Rice: By contrast, some of the biggest declines came from Giovanni Capriglione (no surprise there), Jodie Laubenberg, Phil King, and Cindy Burkett.
  • All three: Joe Straus' committee chairs tended to fall in the most liberal third of the Republican caucus; this topic merits its' own post.
  • All three: Among local reps, John Cyrier (Bastrop), Jason Isaac (Hays), and Paul Workman (Travis) all finished in the middle of the pack.  The Williamson County House delegation (Tony Dale, Marsha Farney, and Larry Gonzales) all finished in the most liberal third of the Republican caucus.  Senators Charles Schwertner (Williamson) and Donna Campbell (Travis/Hays etc.) finished in the 'B' range.
  • CWA/Empower: Cecil Bell and Rick Miller scored substantially higher on CWA's scorecard than Empower Texans.
    • Rice: In the tiebreaker, Bell is the highest rated Straus supporter while Miller is in the middle of the pack.
  • All three: Among Senators who haven't retired Kel Seliger, Joan Huffman, Craig Estes, Robert Nichols, Larry Taylor, and Jane Nelson are the most liberal members of the Republican caucus.
    • Author's Note: That being said, Jane Nelson did a fantastic job as chair of the Finance Committee and deserves some slack.
  • Empower: Former speaker Tom Craddick had a higher score than any Straus appointed committee chair.
  • Empower: Interestingly enough, Dennis Bonnen improved from a 60 to a 72.
Bottom Line: Turnover made this past #TXLEGE incrementally more conservative than the one before.  Turnover will make then next one incrementally more conservative than this one.  Eventually, that turnover will hit critical mass.

    Monday, June 22, 2015

    A tale of two legislative assessment tools....


    "Wisdom rests in the heart of him who has understanding,
    But what is in the heart of fools is made known."
    Proverbs 14:33

    Over the past few days, we've seen the release of the 84th #TXLEGE edition of Texas Monthly's Best and Worst lists and Empower Texans' scorecard; the reactions were revealing.

    Texas Monthly's heirloom rankings were essentially ignored.  While a few people (including this author) congratulated Jonathan Stickland on making the worst list, nobody else said much.  The reaction was subdued, even within Austin.

    By contrast, when Empower Texans released their scorecard this morning, they were immediately attacked by a sitting government official:
    Unlike Texas Monthly's subjective intellectual solipsism, Empower Texans data-driven analysis is calculated upon dozens of record votes.  Their scorecard is a coherent picture of where the legislature stands on their issues.  It's the difference between a scout's opinion and Moneyball.

    One final note on Texas Monthly's list: it was boring.  They could have picked out legislators that at least took interesting stands during the session.  Not that'd we'd agree, but where were Gio or Sarah Davis on the best list?!?  What about Don Huffines on the worst?!?  If you're looking to cure insomnia, the editors explain their picks here.

    Legacy media's decline is apparent.  Lawmakers' votes are a sounder basis for analysis than a gatekeeper's whim.  One reflects truth, the other kabuki theater.  The 84th #TXLEGE saw alternative media reach a critical mass.  One measure will be forgotten by Wednesday; the other will influence voters.

    -----

    Fun Fact:

    - Average Empower Texans Score TM 10 Best: 54.5
    - Average Empower Texans Score TM 10 Worst: 77.1

    Friday, May 22, 2015

    Gio and the Watered Down Gold Bill


    "By covetousness they will exploit you with deceptive words; for a long time their judgment has not been idle, and their destruction does not slumber."
    2 Peter 2:3

    [Author's Note: The 2013 version of the bill can be seen here; the 2015 version can be seen here.]

    Longtime readers will remember that repatriating Texas' Gold was our top priority last session.  The bill died in committee.  Obviously, this was Gio's bill.

    Thus it caught our attention when we noticed a similar bill had passed the House this session.  Something had changed.  For awhile, we were thinking that Gio had actually gotten something important in exchange for his support for Joe Straus.

    Then we decided to read the bills.

    In both versions of the bill, Section 2116.002 establishes the parameters of the Texas Bullion Depository.  Both versions place the agency under the Comptroller's office and enable political subdivisions to store their bullion in the depository.  Only the 2013 version of the bill (page 3), however, enables the depository to:
    (2)provide the basis for a system for precious metals-denominated intergovernmental payments and settlements between and among:
    • (A)the agencies, political subdivisions, and instrumentalities of this state; and 
    • (B)persons making payments to, receiving payments from, or otherwise doing business with an agency, a political subdivision, or another instrumentality of this state in the exercise and discharge of a governmental function or responsibility of the political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality; 
    (3)establish a process and mechanism by which the system described by Subdivision (2) is able to function in the event of a systemic dislocation in a national and international financial system, including systemic problems in liquidity, credit markets, or currency markets; and 
    (4)provide a regulatory and administrative framework for the system described by Subdivision (2) to be made available to private persons.
    In other words, where the 2013 version of the bill had teeth that would help re-establish sound money, the 2015 creates a new state agency that wouldn't accomplish anything.

    On a similar note, Section 2116.028 of the 2013 version of the bill (page 20) fails to make it into the 2015 counterpart:
    Sec.A2116.028. DEVELOPMENT OF DEPOSITORY SYSTEM AND PARTICIPATION. 
    • (a) The comptroller shall monitor the development of the depository-based system of payments and settlements and shall direct and encourage all funds and agencies of this state to use the system for intergovernmental payments and settlements to the extent prudent and practicable.  
    • (b) conditions of acceptance and liquidity of the depository system improve, the comptroller shall: 
      • (1)establish appropriate firm requirements for the use of the system for intergovernmental payments and settlements to the extent prudent and practicable; and 
      • (2)encourage the use of the system by private persons to make or receive payments to or from a state agency or fund.
    Again, rendering the bill toothless.

    Another interesting tidbit from the 2013 version (page 8) that fails to reappear in 2015 is Section 2116.008:
    Sec.A2116.008. FULL FAITH AND CREDIT. The depository ’s obligation to deliver precious metals and transfer account balances to the order of a depository account holder under this chapter is backed by the full faith and credit of this state.
    That being said, if you end up in litigation with the Texas Bullion Depository, at least the 2015 version (page 9) offers this reassurance in Section 2116.009:
    (e)A suit authorized by this section must be brought in a district court of Travis County.
    Because judges in Travis County have such FANTASTIC reputations....

    BOTTOM LINE: The 2013 version of this bill had meaningful economic possibilities.  The only reason it's moved in 2015, however, is because it's been gutted.  Is anyone surprised?!?

    Tuesday, April 7, 2015

    Geren attempting to pull a fast one


    "They profess to know God, but in works they deny Him, being abominable, disobedient, and disqualified for every good work."
    Titus 1:16

    Last week the Texas House licensing committee approved an absurd bill from Charlie Geren that would ban the sale of "powdered alcohol"; as we noted on our Facebook page at the time:


    Two points:a) Yet another waste of time bill from House leadership designed to create a manufactured time crisis at...
    Posted by Adam Cahnman on Monday, March 30, 2015


    In a VERY interesting development, the bill has been sent to the local and consent committee:


    And what, pray tell, is the local and consent committee?!?

    In theory, the local and consent committee is where non-controversial bills are supposed to be referred and easily passed.  That being said, leadership occasionally sends bills there over which they're hoping to avoid a floor debate.  As Texas Homeschool Coalition explained last session:
    For those who are unfamiliar with the process in the Texas House, whenever a bill is voted out of committee the chairman of that committee can elect to send it to one of two places: the Regular Calendars Committee or the Local and Consent Calendars Committee. Controversial bills are sent to the Regular Calendars Committee, while bills that are expected to pass unanimously in the House are sent to the Local and Consent Calendars Committee.

    Is the Local and Consent Calendar ever abused? Yes, definitely. It’s not uncommon for a legislator to try to “sneak” a bill onto the Local and Consent Calendar. If successful, his bill will be brought up early during the day, with possibly a hundred other bills that are quickly glossed over and voted on by legislators who aren’t really paying attention to what’s happening. After all, why should they? The bills are supposed to be non-controversial and would have unanimous support anyway.
    Bottom Line: For Geren and Straus to send this bill to Local and Consent instead of Calendars reveals a lack of confidence in the merit of their underlying position.

    -----

    Worth noting is that Geren's fellow Tarrant County colleague, Giovanni Capriglione, serves on Local and Consent:

    Giovanni Capriglione:
    (512) 463-0690
    @VoteGiovanni

    Friday, February 6, 2015

    Gio Gets Played


    "The wise shall inherit glory,
    But shame shall be the legacy of fools."
    Proverbs 3:35

    On Wednesday, Joe Straus released committee assignments.  While predictably awful, they were also revealing.  For obvious reasons, Gio is a case in point.  According to the legacy GOP narrative, Gio got 'plum' assignments on Appropriations and Local and Consent.  As the concern trolls at Texas Observer so 'helpfully' explain:
    But Giovanni Capriglione, a Republican from the Metroplex who bucked his tea party supporters and loudly supported Straus, came out of his ordeal pretty decently. He sits on Appropriations, Local and Consent Calendars, and Investments and Financial Services—the last committee is sought-after for its members ability to raise money from the many well-heeled outsiders who have business before it.
    But all is not as it seems.

    An individual member makes little difference on any given committee (ESPECIALLY Appropriations).  What matters is the chairmanship and the composition of the committee.  Looking at Gio's committee assignments in context makes it obvious that he will be irrelevant on his 'plum' committees.

    Empower Texans and YCT produce the most reliable conservative policy indexes in Texas; their 2013 rankings illustrate Gio's folly:

    [Author's note: With a 94.4 from Empower Texans and a 92 from YCT, Gio had the highest score on either index.]

    Appropriations:
    • Chairman score: 35.5 ET; 41 YCT.
    • Committee Average (with Gio): 40.5 ET; 40.1 YCT.
    • Committee Average (without Gio): 38.1 ET; 37.8 YCT.
    Local and Consent:
    • Chairman score: 22.2 ET; 15 YCT.
    • Committee Average (with Gio): 51.8 ET; 51.7 YCT
    • Committee Average (without Gio): 48.2 ET; 48.4 YCT
    • Committee Average (without Gio, Jason Isaac, or Drew Springer): 39.7 ET; 34.8 YCT. (*)
    Bottom Line: Having a "seat at the table" is irrelevant.  Even if you get a "seat," leadership will stack the remaining "seats" at said "table" to make your "seat" meaningless.  Anyone who believes otherwise is a sucker.

    Methodology Below:


    -----

    * -- While we we didn't calculate their respective committee averages, a glance at Jason Isaac's and Drew Springer's assignments reveals a similar phenomenon.

    -----

    From the great minds think alike department, Tony McDonald likewise observes:
    The media were quick to point the finger at those conservatives who had stayed true to their convictions and supported Scott Turner for Speaker. These members were “foolish” and had allegedly been punished with “bad” committee assignments, while members who sold out their principles and constituents were lauded for reaping great “rewards.”

    To paraphrase a quote from Ronald Reagan, “It isn’t so much that the liberal media is ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so.”

    The reality is that the Speaker and his allies engage in a false barter with members. It reminds us of the trade offered by Bart Simpson to his father, Homer: “I’ll trade you this delicious doorstop for that crummy old Danish,” offered Bart. In much the same way, House leadership, the media, and the lobby are all busy telling members that they will really enjoy a spot on a “powerful” committee if they will just trade in their crummy old ability to vote “no.”

    A “coveted” spot on House Appropriations is put up as the sweetest plum of all. Many in the media were quick to latch on to the fact that Rep. Giovanni Capriglione, who infamously turned his back on his former conservative ally Scott Turner at a local Tea Party meeting, was given a spot on the “budget writing” committee.

    However, as we have pointed out before, members on the Appropriations Committee don’t actually write the budget. That task is reserved for a small handful of appointees to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB) and the bureaucrats they employ. After the budget is released by the LBB, the Appropriations Committee members meet early and often, but only end up tinkering around the edges of the initial document. Then, after both chambers pass the budget, it is sent to another small hand-selected group on the conference committee who largely rewrite the document as they see fit.
    -----

    Update: Another funny note is that Gio, Isaac, and Springer were the only low-threshold conservatives to get on any of the important committees; the rest were shut out completely. 

    Thursday, January 1, 2015

    Gio Provokes Home County Backlash


    "Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests and said, “What are you willing to give me if I deliver Him to you?” And they counted out to him thirty pieces of silver."
    Matthew 26:14-15

    Ouch:



    Highlights:

    • Joe Straus is the Harry Reid of Texas.
    • "Vote no to Joe Straus."

    Friday, December 26, 2014

    Straus supporting Reps who had bills killed last session


    "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves."
    Matthew 7:15

    Perusing Joe Straus' record, we were struck by the number of Reps who had bills killed last session who nonetheless (inexplicably) support returning Straus to the speakership:

    Gio:














    Craig Goldman:




















    Jodie Laubenberg:

















    Drew Springer:











    James White:


















    Which begs the next question: What kind of Stockholm Syndrome does it take to return the leadership that killed your bills last session to the same position this coming session?!?

    Tuesday, November 11, 2014

    Giovanni Capriglione: The End of a Career


    "Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests and said, “What are you willing to give me if I deliver Him to you?” And they counted out to him thirty pieces of silver."
    Matthew 26:14-15

    It's Tarrant County, the commercials write themselves:



    To be honest, this isn't a surprise.  We first heard he was leaning this way in August.  Still, the depth of the sellout becomes apparent when you read his op-ed from Saturday:
    Transportation financing will be one of the items at the top of the agenda.
    Really, transportation funding as the #1 issue?!?  Nobody opposes adding highway capacity, we object to the fact that you come back and ask us for more money after you've already increased spending by 26%.  But yah, "transportation"....

    Read
    The op-ed gets better, check out this drivel section on education:
    One major item that did not receive its fair share of the campaign attention was public education. This is even more remarkable considering that Judge John Dietz released his long-awaited decision on public education finance just two months before Election Day.

    This is an issue where Republican officials can and should lead. Improving the quality of education is not a partisan issue, but by remaining relatively silent the ruling Republican party allowed Democrats to gain crossover votes.

    I see an incredible opportunity for us to make positive education finance reforms in next year’s session — before being forced to do so by the courts.
    Three paragraphs about "public education" and "education finance reforms" without mentioning school choice?!?  Duly noted.

    We could almost forgive the Straus thing, but the op-ed makes clear he now endorses all of the Lobby's legislative priorities.

    Agendawise has a good summary of what this means:
    He seems to believe, as cynical insider thinking teaches, that by next primary voters won’t remember betrayals done at this point in the political calendar. In fact, the speaker may now even put him in front of one of next session’s unavoidable conservative outcomes in order to show his supporters how much he “gets done” now that he’s in with Straus.

    Outcomes like these are always the result of conservative outsiders altering the political terrain in Texas. Nevertheless, insiders funnel the credit, as best they can, to their own people to keep as much control over the landscape as possible.

    But a vote for Straus is not just an endorsement of a corrupt politician, it’s an endorsement of the ruling class kabuki theater that would leave voters naked and unarmed against their aggressors in Austin. This theater always includes things like low expectations, coordinated celebration of moderate results as conservative, a tough fight on a big conservative issue that is just barely lost but is set up so everyone can point the finger at someone else, no discussion of the many, many real conservative bills and issues that never see the light of day because the speaker didn’t want them to, and much else besides.
    We concur with North Texas Tea Party:
    Let’s make this simple for the members of the Texas House:

    ANY STATE REPRESENTATIVE WHO VOTES FOR JOE STRAUS AGAINST SCOTT TURNER WILL BE PRECLUDED FROM GAINING NTTP TEAAPPROVAL. ANYONE WHO VOTES TO NOT HAVE ANY OPEN RECORDED VOTE ON THIS ISSUE WILL ALSO BE PRECLUDED.

    Various people claim we do not ‘understand how Austin works': the problem is, we DO understand how Austin ‘works’- some of us have understood that since the early 80s. And the way Austin works NEEDS TO CHANGE!

    We do not work to elect people simply to vote the most conservative they can in the highly constrained environment Joe Straus maintains which precludes the truly tough votes. We work to elect WARRIORS to batter the ‘country club’ doors down and force votes- win or lose- on the really tough issues of the day. We are told good conservatives cannot get committee chairs if the current ‘Powers That Be’ are contested. Well, they weren’t contested in the last session- so kindly point out the powerful committee chairs that WERE assigned to ‘good conservatives’- NOT ONE!

    Scott Turner is a unique individual, the likes of which we are unlikely to see again. As the ‘principled conservative’ core continues to grow each term at a faster rate than the ‘getalongs’ can corrupt them, we will soon reach a tipping point wherein the majority of the GOP caucus will put up someone like Jonathan Stickland for House, and the ‘getalong’s will face vindictive retribution for years of poor treatment. Scott Turner represents a unique opportunity to make the changeover WITHOUT that sort of vindictiveness. It simply isn’t in Scott’s character. We WILL throw in one caveat, though. If Joe Straus IS elected and the House TRULY DOES have a conservative session- as CONSERVATIVE GROUPS define it, NOT Austin- then those who voted for Straus will win a reprieve.
    Bottom Line: It's his funeral.

    -----

    Update: An earlier version of this misspelled Gio's name and incorrectly attributed the last statement to the NE Tarrant Tea party.  These mistakes have subsequently been corrected.  We got sloppy, we apologize.

    Friday, April 12, 2013

    EXCLUSIVE: Colorado Republican Shares Hard Learned Lessons for Texas

    (Author's Note: Sean Duffy is in the center of the picture, next to Santorum)
    Today, Cahnman's Musings was blessed to speak for 45 minutes with Sean Duffy former deputy Chief of Staff to former Colorado Governor Bill Owens.  Almost a decade ago, Sean Duffy was a source of ours when we worked with Robert Novak.  During that time, the left was in the early stages of its takeover of Colorado.

    Since the election of 2012, as the left has announced its intention to use the Colorado model in Texas, Cahnman's Musings thought back to those conversations we had with Sean Duffy in 2004 many times.  In 2004, there was something happening on the ground in Colorado that we did not understand at the time.  Having been on the front-lines of those battles, Sean Duffy shared his thoughts with Cahnman's Musings:



    Highlights: 

    Education -- Early in their rise to power, the left demagogued Education.
    • In the Early 2000's education in Colorado was a mess.  Amendment 23, passed in 2000, created a mandate in the state constitution that required the state to spend at least inflation PLUS 1% on education.  This chaotic policy environment gave the left an opportunity to operate in Colorado in a way that doesn't exist in Texas today.
    • In discussing education: "Moms and Dads like substance....There's ways to deal with this [education] in a substantive way where you can get Moms and Dads to focus."
      • Author's Note: In Texas, that means School Choice, School Choice, and School Choice.
    • "If we fight over dollars we lose, if we fight over substance we win."
      •  Author's Note: I think that's the most important line in the whole interview.
    Tactics of the Left
    • The left likes to "create chaos and drop a piano on someone's head."
    • The left systematically took out key Republicans in the state legislature by demogoguing particular votes and spending multiples of what had previously been spent in state legislative races; they knew who to pick off.
      • Author's note: In Texas, my educated guess is that Donna Campbell and Giovanni Capriglione are the two most likely candidates.
      • In a hilarious and ironic turn of events, this point might be the silver lining of Joe Straus' leadership. If there's one thing members of the Texas House know how to do, it's raise money and campaign.  No vulnerable Republican in the Texas House will ever lack for money.
    • The left has "an extraordinary ground game"
      • "The Left loves to go door-to-door."
      •  Day in, day out, door-to-door organizing.
      • Teachers "literally go door-to-door."
      •  "We just don't do that"...."[W]e don't cultivate neighborhoods the way the left does."
    •  Ken Salazar 2004:
      • Ran as a moderate and was well liked.
    •  "The spend a lot of time ripping our guys' heads off and we don't do as well in terms of finding the 1 or 2 message points that really unravels somebody in the public mind."
     Differences with Texas:
    • Texas conservatives already have the seven capabilities; we can get a LOT better in how we deploy them, but we're building from a solid foundation.
      • "This is the bread and butter of the left; they stand up organizations that do each of those things and they fund them."
      • Intellectual Ammunition: Texas Public Policy Foundation.
      • Mobilize for elections: Anyone who volunteered for Ted Cruz knows how many people were block-walking in 100 degree heat heading into that LATE JULY runoff!
      • Pursuing investigations: Who uncovered CSCOPE?!?
      • Strategic Litigation: Does the name Greg Abbott ring a bell?!?
    •  Colorado was never the Republican stronghold that Texas is today.
      • Bill Owens was the first Republican governor in 25 years.
      • Ken Salazar was an incumbent state Attorney General before he was elected to the U.S. Senate; in Texas terms that would be like having Joaquin Castro serve alongside Rick Perry.
      • In Texas, by contrast, no Democrat has won statewide office since 1994.
    •  Entrepreneurs in the Minority communities.
    How you beat the left:
    • "You've gotta get into the specifics of where the dollars are going and pound the crap out of them!"
    Finally, via e-mail, Sean Duffy shares his thoughts on how conservatives, in general, can improve our messaging:
    I just think we do so much better when we use emotion, and strong compelling narrative to back up our points.  Whether in charter schools or school choice, folks are moved by the plight of eager mothers who are fighting to get their kids educated.  We are moved by entrepreneurs who succeed despite humble beginnings.  More and more, it’s the narrative that has to be developed to bolster our policy points…particularly in the new media environment.
     Bottom Line: Texas conservatives must always remain vigilant, but we're a LOT better prepared for this fight than the left thinks we are.

    Wednesday, April 10, 2013

    Revised Priorities for the 83rd Texas Legislature


    Back in February, Cahnman's Musings published this list of big ticket items for the 83rd Texas Legislature; heading into the final six weeks of the session, these are our revised priorities:
    1. Gold, gold, gold - Rep. Giovanni Capriglione has proposed building a depository to store Gold bullion.  Governor Perry supports this effort.  Repatriating our own gold, and creating a safe haven for others' gold, will enable Texas to withstand the coming global economic [REDACTED]storm.  In a world where bank deposits are being confiscated, safety has value.  Accomplishing this task will allow us to live to fight another day.
    2. School Choice - K-12 education is 40% of state spending.  Keeping long-term education spending under control is essential to keep the budget under control.  Putting the money in the hands of parents instead of educrats will also help pre-empt future CSCOPE's.
    3. Medicaid - Medicaid expansion is economic suicide; just say no.
    4. Transparency/Pensions - As we said in February: "Local government debt in Texas is $324 billion.  Pension obligations are a big chunk of that debt.  The interrelated issues of local debt and pension obligations are a time bomb the legislature should defuse before it becomes a crisis."
    5. Texas Budget Compact - This is Rick Perry's baby.  To our knowledge, he isn't doing bupkus to get it passed.  Cahnman's Musings was an early supporter of the Texas Budget Compact, but if Rick Perry isn't going to do squat to pass his signature initiative, why should we?!?
    There's still time to pass every item on this list.  These are structural reforms that will strengthen Texas' economy for the next generation.  If the 83rd Texas legislature delivers on these five items, Cahnman's Musings can live with a lot of other crap.

    Monday, April 1, 2013

    Kevin Freeman: You can run but you can't hide (except maybe in Texas)


    Cahnman's Musings has been familiar with Kevin Freeman since we read his book Secret Weapon last year.  Thus, it heartens us to hear Freeman speak approvingly of Rep. Giovanni Capriglione's effort to establish a gold bullion depository in the state of Texas. Freeman writes:
    The most asked question after people grasp that we are in a global economic war is “What do I do with my money?” Now, it is a pretty astounding revelation to understand that the next global war, or more precisely the one we are in now, is not fought with tanks and planes. It is fought with money and computers. It is not a cyber war as so many have thought. It is an economic war and cyber is simply one of the many battlefields.

    It wasn’t a cyber attack that doomed Cypriot depositors to lose 10%, 30%, or 80% of their deposits over 100,000 Euro (or however it ends up). No, it was bank failures and the pressures of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the European Union. These were terms “handed down.” No computer needed in this case.

    Of course, there is a massive cyber battle underway. In fact, just last week may have been the largest attack in history. Here at home, JP Morgan Chase depositors logged on to their accounts recently only to see zero balances across the board. We have been told that this wasn’t hacking but rather a computer glitch. but, it could have been hacking and that is the point.

    Once someone realizes that this is a global economic war they understand that their bank accounts, life savings, stock holdings, and even currency could come under attack. The immediate response is to ask how to protect your money. Unfortunately, there is no “one size fits all” answer. The reality is that no single approach can work.

    ....

    The reality is that gold has been confiscated in the past and could be confiscated in the future.  If the IMF can raid Cyprus-held bank accounts, do you believe gold bars in your home would be immune?


    It is interesting to note that the state of Texas may ask for their gold to be held in the state. A new bill sponsored by Giovanni Capriglione and supported by Governor Rick Perry may pave the way for one place to possibly hide. If successful, this bill opens some interesting possibilities as mentioned by Jim Rickards, best-selling author of Currency Wars. [Rickards has been featured extensively warning of the risks of a dollar collapse. He led a war game effort in the Pentagon that showed how Russia and China could destroy our currency.]
    It makes us breathe just a little easier knowing that Kevin Freeman favors these efforts.

    Update: Apparently, Kevin Freeman helped craft this plan.

    Monday, March 25, 2013

    Texas State Rep. Giovanni Capriglione on Repatriating Texas' Gold


    Texas State Rep. Giovanni Capriglione stopped by GB's radio show to discuss his efforts to establish a Gold bullion depository in the State of Texas:


    Highlights:
    • Bullion depository in the state of Texas; Perry supports it.
    • The law will be passed by May and go into effect on 9/1.
    • After the law is passed, the State will determine the location.
    • Disconnecting Texas' banking system from the nightmare that is coming.
    • Texas' electric grid is independent of the rest of the country.