Showing posts with label Bill Worsham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Worsham. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Travis County Taxpayers Union hosts Courthouse Bond Press Conference


"There is desirable treasure,
And oil in the dwelling of the wise,
But a foolish man squanders it."
Proverbs 21:20

Austin City Hall -- The Travis County Taxpayers Union held a press conference this morning to discuss a better alternative to the current proposed playground for 1200 rich downtown lawyers:



Highlights:

  • Travis County never seriously considered other alternatives.
  • The only way to produce an alternative is to defeat this bond.
  • "Bonds equal taxes, bonds equal rent increases."
  • Travis County lying about the size of the tax increase.
    • County figures doesn't included NON-VOTER APPROVED debt county used to "purchase" current proposed site.
  • Building on the East Side would cost 25-50% less.
    • Surface parking vs underground parking alone.
  • East side location more accessible to county's poorest residents than downtown.
  • East Austin has been promised various public facilities for five decades, it's time to deliver.

2015-10-13 TCTU

Monday, October 5, 2015

Travis County receives FIERCE pushback on Courthouse

Commissioner Gerald Daugherty (R - Western Travis County)

"There is desirable treasure,
And oil in the dwelling of the wise,
But a foolish man squanders it."
Proverbs 21:20



Travis County Commissioners Court -- Commissioner Gerald Daugherty, the only Republican on the Travis County Commissioners court, held a forum with the Travis County Taxpayers Union to discuss the proposed Courthouse bond this afternoon.  Daugherty, who supports the bond, repeated the company line about the current aging Courthouse that no one disputes.  The presentation was, to put it mildly, greeted with skepticism.

Belinda Powell, a county bureaucrat, handled the bulk of the presentation, she was assisted by Matias Segurra, an outside consultant with AECOM.

The most notable claim the county made was that the current proposal is a "design, build" project.  This means that everything we're hearing before the vote is a "concept" but we won't know the final plan until construction begins. Council member Don Zimmerman got the county to admit the ballot language was impossibly vague.  The county attributed that to a need for "flexibility."  Essentially, we have to pass the bond to find out what's in it.

The primary objections dealt with the issue of parking.  Former Austin City Council candidate Bill Worsham got the county admitted the new courthouse won't have sufficient parking to cover peak usage.  Several African-American residents of East Austin bemoaned the cost of parking downtown.  They were unpersuaded by the county's discussion of the bus routes available downtown.  One elderly gentleman explained that it was insulting to expect people who live in the outer reaches of the city to take the bus for two hours (each way) to reach downtown instead of building a facility with adequate parking.

Two of the (Democrat) candidates for the open seat in Precinct 1, Richard Franklin and Arthur Sampson, attended; both oppose the current proposal.

The bonds would have a duration of 20 years and the county currently has $695 million in debt outstanding.

Bottom Line: Today's presentation doesn't change the fact that current Courthouse proposal would produce a traffic nightmare, doesn't have NEARLY enough parking, and would make Austin's affordability issues worse.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

"Strange" Bedfellows: Robert Thomas and Austin ISD


"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves..."
Matthew 7:15

Robert Thomas is running for Austin City Council on a platform of alleged fiscal conservatism.  Unfortunately, his record indicates an unsettling closeness with the government school bureaucracies, most notably Austin ISD.  He seems to have a soft spot for school district debt.

In 2013, while this website was working to defeat the Austin ISD bond, Robert Thomas made the following comment:
Robert Thomas is on the Community Bond Oversight Committee and is a board member for the Northwest Austin Civic Association. Speaking as a Northwest Austin resident and not a representative of either organization, he said he wants what is best for the community.

“I’m very supportive of the bonds, but I am unsure how I will vote on each individual proposition,” Thomas said.

He said many residents would like to see the district address overcrowding in Northwest Austin schools such as Murchison Middle School and Anderson High School. That might persuade them to vote for Proposition 2, which includes eliminating portable classrooms and building new infrastructure on existing campuses to aid with overcrowding.
 But it gets better, from his website:


Which begs the real question: How does an alleged 'fiscal conservative' get a seat on the bond 'oversight' committee and get endorsed by the outgoing President of the Board of Trustees?!?

Bottom Line: A City Council candidate who supported the largest bond initiative in Austin ISD history and enjoys the support of the local education establishment can call himself many things; a fiscal conservative ain't one of 'em.

Vote Bill Worsham!!!

Monday, October 20, 2014

Austin City Council: Conservative/Libertarian Voter Guide


"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2

Author's Note: Readers can find their Austin City Council District here; readers can find TCRP's endorsement spreadsheet here.

With early voting set to commence in Austin's historic 10-1 election, the 78 candidates currently running can be intimidating.  Here at Cahnman's Musings, we've been studying these races for months.  We endorse the following candidates:

District 1 -- (Far Northeast Austin): Michael Cargill


Texas Firearms Celebrity Michael Cargill was the first federally licensed firearms dealer to accept BITCOIN in his store.  That, by itself, should tell you everything you need to know about him.  In a city where entrenched special interests are abusing the political process to preserve their status, Cargill's actions illustrate his commitment to genuine innovation.

Cargill has been a fixture in local politics for some time.  In 2012, he ran against an incumbent Travis County constable who had previously accepted money from drug cartels.  Unfortunately, a la Rosemary Lehmberg, the Democrat machine rallied around their incumbent.  In 2013, Cargill was a critical presence in the successful campaign against the Austin ISD bond.  He has a documented history of taking on petty tyrants.

Cargill is running on a platform of fiscal responsibility and reducing traffic.  He has signed the Citizens for Tax Relif NOW pledge.  He has also been endorsed by Texans for Accountable Government (TAG). Specifically, he has proposed widening 183 as a free road and relocating City of Austin offices from downtown to the outskirts of the city.   Cargill will also protect our second amendment rights from gun grabbing politicians at the local level.

Avoid: DeWayne Lofton -- Supports the rail bond.

District 2 -- (Southeast Austin): They All Suck.

District 3 -- (Central East Austin): Kent Philips

A former regional coordinator for Debra Medina, Kent Phillips is running to lower Austin's cost of living by eliminating wasteful spending and burdensome regulations.  Kent intends to audit the city budget, implement zero-based budgeting, and pass budgets at the effective tax rate.  Kent understands that the root cause of Austin's current affordability challenges is a City Council (and County and School District) that regulates too much, spends too much, and taxes too much.

Endorsed by TAG, Kent is a regular attendee at Liberty on the Rocks and other liberty themed events around Austin.

As a rapidly gentrifying part of town, affordability challenges are especially poignant in District 3.  We should know, this is our home district.  We intend to vote for Kent Philips and you should as well.

Avoid: Susana Almanza -- Supports $15 hr minimum wage; remember, this one's personal.

District 4 -- (North Central Austin): Laura Pressley

The best prepared and most knowledgeable candidate in this district, Laura Pressley is the clear choice in District 4.  A 26 year Austin resident, Laura was instrumental in passing 10-1.  She has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Laura ran against Mike Martinez in 2012.  She supports a 20% homestead exemption and reduction (Author's note: preferably elimination) of corporate subsidies.  She has spoken previously about cost saving measures at Austin Energy.

Laura has previously supported Ron Paul and has earned the endorsement of TAG.  She intends to curb the "we're rich" culture of spending at City Hall. Pressley is the candidate in district 4 most clearly committed to the fiscal pruning City Hall desperately needs.

Avoid: Gregorio Casar -- A Leftist Demagogue in the mold of Julian Castro and Hugo Chavez who has raised serious money.

District 5 (South Central Austin): Mike Rodriguez

Another longtime 10-1 advocate, Mike Rodriguez knows the City of Austin's budget in more detail than anyone this author has ever met.  He's been studying the City of Austin's culture of overspending for decades.  And it shows.

Mike wants lower cost of living by reducing burdensome regulations.  He specifically cites Project Connect, Code Next, and Imagine Austin.  He has been endorsed by Texans for Fiscal Responsibility (TFR) and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Mike says it best on his website: "Rather than always thinking of what more government can do, Mike will stay focused on the need to limit any added burden on our taxpayers and renters."

District 6 (Far Northwest Austin): Jay Wiley

Jay Wiley got in this race over a year ago.  He's raised more money than all the other candidates combined.  He's been endorsed by TFR and was the first candidate in the race to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.  While there are other fantastic candidates in this district, this isn't their time or race.  Don't try to get cute.  If conservative voters are smart, this can be an easy win.  Vote with your head, not your heart.



District 7 (North Austin): Ed English

In a race full of career bureaucrats, Ed English is the only candidate in District 7 to have worked in the real world.  A successful businessman, Ed led the fight to pass 10-1.  As a leader of Austinites for Geographic Representation, he donated "several thousand hours" over a "two year period".

Ed is running to eliminate wasteful spending and give hard working taxpayers "real relief."  He understand that excessive regulation, excessive spending, and excessive taxation are the root cause of Austin's affordability challenges.  He also opposed boondoggles like water treatment plant #4 and the biomass plant.

Finally, Ed is the only district 7 candidate who lives north of 183.  This is an important advantage, considering that two thirds of the district is north of 183.  He has also signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

District 8 (Southwest Austin): Ellen Troxclair

Ellen Troxclair has been called "a spending hawk."  She's also been called "a suburban pit bull."  We have another title for the list: Ellen Troxclair is a femme fatale for bloated government.

Considering the demographics of the district and her issue positions relative to the other candidates, supporting Ellen is the easiest decision in the city.  District 8 is a 50/50 district, and Ellen is the only conservative candidate in the race.  In addition to working as a realtor, Ellen is a former chief of staff to State Rep Jason Isaac and has been endorsed by TFR and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Traffic congestion is, easily and by far, the biggest problem in district 8.  Ellen has pledged to start with "with improving our road system....Money spent on transportation solutions should focus on getting the greatest number of people to the most in-demand locations. To help with the congestion, we must increase our road capacity, improve our bus service to the region, and allow for innovate transportation options such as Lyft and Uber."

District 9 (Central Austin): Erin McGann

Erin McGann is the only candidate running in district 9 who isn't an incumbent.  That should tell you everything you need to know.  She's been endorsed by TFR and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Erin is the only candidate in district 9 to oppose the current rail boondoggle.  Erin supports cost effective traffic solutions like traffic-light synchronization and expanded bus service.  She also opposes corporate-welfare masquerading as "business incentives."

Regarding affordability and the central premise of her campaign, Erin writes: "Current City Council doesn’t seem to understand the correlation between increased taxes and affordability. When Council approves more spending, higher utilities or taxes, the level of affordability decreases, and yet Council continues to pay lip service to affordability while increasing spending.  We need prioritize the basic needs of Austin – fix our roads and sidewalks, encourage and improve middle-income apartments and condos, the increase the number of multi-bedroom units for families, keep utility rates low, fund our first responders and end corporate subsidies."

Avoid: Riley and Tovo are both AWFUL!!!

District 10 (West Austin): Bill Worsham

While there are several candidates with a Republican voting history in district 10, Bill is the most solidly conservative.  He's been endorsed by TFR and TAG and was the first candidate in district 10 to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.  As a civil engineer, Bill's professional background leaves him uniquely suited to understand the technical details of Austin's transportation challenges.

On transportation, Bill supports expanding our road and highway network.  He supports ridesharing and cost effective solutions like traffic light synchronization.  He does not support the current rail proposal.

Bill understands how regulation and taxation indirectly inflates housing costs.  He is specifically committed to reducing red tape for restaurant owners.  He's the candidate best positioned to give the Austin City Council the radical course correction it needs next January.

Avoid: Robert Thomas -- Claims to be a fiscal conservative but brags about sitting on the Austin ISD bond committee on his campaign website.


Mayor (Citywide): Todd Phelps

With Adler virtually guaranteed to make the runoff, there's no reason not to swing for the fences in the first round of the mayoral race.  Unlike the "big three," Todd Phelps opposes the current urban rail boondoggle.  He was the first mayoral candidate to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Avoid: Mike Martinez -- The worst member of the current council.








Bond Initiatives -- Vote AGAINST all:
  • Prop. 1 City of Austin (Urban Rail)
  • Prop. 1 ACC
  • Prop. 2 ACC
  • Prop. 1 State of Texas ("Transportation")

Thursday, October 16, 2014

7 Candidates Sign Citizens for Tax Relief Taxpayer Protection Pledge


"But the former governors who were before me laid burdens on the people, and took from them bread and wine, besides forty shekels of silver. Yes, even their servants bore rule over the people, but I did not do so, because of the fear of God. "
Nehemiah 5:15

Wowzers!!!
In the first 24 hours of making our tax relief pledge public, SEVEN candidates for Austin City Council have signed!

The signers include:

Ed English - District 7
Laura Pressley - District 4
Erin McGann - District 9
Jason Denny - District 5
Jay Wiley - District 6
Bill Worsham - District 10
Ellen Troxclair - District 8

These candidates are committing to bring accountability to City Hall and tax relief to Austin residents. We are encouraged by the rapid support for the three tenants of the pledge:

1. Audit the City of Austin
Support and advocate for an independent operational and financial audit of all city departments and functions.

2. 20% Homestead Exemption
Support and advocate for immediate tax relief for homeowners by implementing the full 20% Homestead Exemption.

3. Budget at the Effective Tax Rate
Support and advocate for annual operating budgets that do not exceed the effective tax rate and for zero-based budgeting for all operations.

If you agree with this pledge and want to see real change come to City Hall, please forward it to every Austin voter you know. Then, "LIKE" our Facebook page -- we'll keep you posted on City Council candidates who sign the pledge so you who will take REAL steps to lower your cost of living.

Don't use Facebook? Then go to our website and click on Candidate Pledge to see who has signed.

Citizens for Tax Relief NOW is a citizen-led grassroots group that wants to make sure people like you get REAL tax relief on Election Day, not more hyperbole.

--> DON'T FORGET! Election Day is November 4, and early voting runs from Oct. 20-31.

To see who's on the ballot in the Council District where you live, CLICK HERE.

Thank you, and God bless!

Cindy Mallette
Organizer, Citizens for Tax Relief NOW
www.citizensfortaxreliefnow.com
cindymallette@gmail.com

Friday, October 10, 2014

Partying with Austin's Future Taxpayer Friendly Leaders


"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice."
Proverbs 29:2 (a)

Local Voice Solutions -- Tonight, taxpayer friendly candidates in 6 of Austin's 10 city council districts spoke at an event in East Austin.  The candidates discussed affordability and the role that Austin's massive, boondoggle prone, city government plays in exacerbating that problem.  This website bring you their remarks in full.

Michael Cargill, District 1:



Highlights:
  • Most conservative candidate in District 1 on the subject of firearms.
  • Running to obstruct Mike Martinez's gun grabbing agenda.
  • "We're going to maintain all of our constitutional rights."
  • Plan for traffic: Widen 183, as a free road, to give commercial traffic a viable path around Downtown Austin.
    • Austin is one of the few major cities in America where big trucks pass through downtown.
  • Sell "Prime Real Estate" downtown and relocate city offices to the outskirts of the city.
  • "We don't need that rail, that rail to nowhere...."
 Jay Wiley, District 6:



Highlights:
  • "I'm running because we need a new voice for taxpayers at City Hall...we've never had that before."
  • "Here's the big picture.  The big picture is that the affordability problem we have in Austin is the direct result of a big and expensive local government.  We've seen what big, expensive government looks like.  It looks like Higher property tax bills, and worse energy bills every month, and it looks like worse and worse traffic every day because we've got all the wrong priorities at City Hall."
  • "What I want to do is I want to lower taxes, I want to lessen the bureaucratic largesse at City Hall, and ... most importantly change the culture at City Hall to one that's fiscally responsible and respects taxpayers."
  • "We are weeks away from putting the first conservatives on Austin City Council in my lifetime; let's get it done."
Ellen Troxclair, District 8 (She likes puppies and Uber):



Highlights:
  • Over a decade of public policy experice at the Capitol combined with real world experience in the Real Estate industry.
  • Not a day goes by, either in the campaign or her business, where she doesn't hear about how the Austin CC's decision are negative effecting resident of District 8.
  •  "Seems like every year in Austin our cost of living is increasing while our quality of life is not improving."
  • It took conversations with thousands of voters before she met her first voter who said property taxes weren't too high...and that person was a recent California transplant.
    • Author's Note: We welcome California transplants to Austin...as long as you don't vote for the same crap policies that ruined California.
  • "I don't think that our goal, as Austinites, should be to be slightly better than California."
Ed English, District 7:



Highlights:
  • "I'm running for a lot of reasons that fall under the umbrella of fiscal responsiblility."
  • "I want to be part of a council" that ends wasteful spending and gives taxpayers real relief.
  • Donated "several thousand hours" over "a two year period" to pass 10-1 in the first place.
  • Seize this opportunity to represent the citizens.
  • Only candidate in his district that has worked in the private sector.
  • First candidate, in any district, to oppose the rail bond tax hike...aka. Leffingwell Loser!!!
Erin McGann, District 9:



Highlights:
  • Background in finance, auditing, and budget review.
  • "I am running for city council because our budget is entirely too fat, our spending is not very judicious, and we've got a lot of unicorns and glitter sitting around city hall and not very much bricks and mortar."
  • "My opponents are being strongly supported by the status quo and by all of the special interests in Austin so I am being seriously outspent."
    • Author's note: Donate here.
  •  Needs blockwalkers and phonebankers.
Bill Worsham, District 10:



Highlights:
  •  "It is way past time to just talk about the traffic, the cost of living, and the red tape that we have to endure in the city of Austin.  
  • Endorsed by TAG and TFL.
  • Specifically committed to reducing red tape for resturant owners.
  • "We are right on the issues of this campaign"
  • Opponents are imitating their campaign...."we are the rocket that's ready to launch."

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Citizens for Tax Relief Now's Press Conference


"But the former governors who were before me laid burdens on the people, and took from them bread and wine, besides forty shekels of silver. Yes, even their servants bore rule over the people, but I did not do so, because of the fear of God."
Nehemiah 5:15

Austin City Hall -- This afternoon, Citizens for Tax Relief Now held a press conference to discuss alternatives to the tax increase the current lame duck city council is set to impose on Austin:

Broadcast live streaming video on Ustream

Highlights:
  • Cindy Malette -- People are now paying more in property taxes than mortgages.
    • Her rent went up substantially in 2013.
    • Rail, busses, and bikes aren't viable for people with kids.
    • Affordability crisis is due to tax rate, not appraisals.
    • Effective tax rate equals tax relief now.
    • City and county are operating a dysfunctional system.
    • 90,000 people protested property taxes in 2014, only 50,000 voted in last Austin City Council election.
  • Bill Worsham -- Two paths: Either chase unicorns or promote prosperity for all Austinites.
  • Kent Philips -- City is driving gentrification.
  • Julian Fernandez -- Will lower property taxes by 20%
    • Forensic Audit and zero-based budgeting.
    • Helen Diaz, age 90, had to sell her home because of property taxes.
    • WWII vets are getting priced out in East Austin.
    • We cannot let people lose their home because of high property taxes.
  • Todd Phelps --  We're trying to retain our soul in Austin.
    • Doesn't want to wait four years for a homestead exemption.
    • Current group running city hall got us into this affordability/traffic crisis.
  • Richard Franklin -- Local Government doesn't do a cost/benefit analysis, just give $$$ to special interests.
  • Peggy Venable -- ATX is the poster child for local government debt.
    • 10 cents of every dollar Austin ISD spends goes to debt service.
  • Dean Wright -- 3 actions City/County needs to take:
    • Freeze 2014 tax rate.
    • Audit city agencies every two years.
    • Zero-based budgeting every two years.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Bill Worsham Launches Austin City Council Campaing


"He who is faithful in what is least is faithful also in much; and he who is unjust in what is least is unjust also in much."
Luke 16:10

Last night, Bill Worsham launched his campaign for Austin City Council.  In front of a packed house, he spoke about his background and what he hopes to achieve on the council.  His remarks below:



Highlights:

  • "My name is Bill Worsham and I want to be your first city councilman from district 10."
  • 19 year Austin resident.
  • Aggie engineer (we won't holdit against him).
  • Civil engineering project manager for 25 years.
  • Has extensive experience is resource management and resource protection.
  • Member of the Real Estate Council of Austin.
  • Personal Mobility, not one size fits all.
  • "Someone needs to step in and address the big picture.
    • "The big picture is that city government is too big and costs too much."
    • Opportunity costs - People waste time and money dealing with B.S. from the city instead of being productive or living their life.
  • Defends Jim Skaggs against attacks from the Chronicle.
  • Told story about conflicting regulations between the code inspectors and the fire department.
After Bill spoke, his campaign manager Rachel Kania (full disclosure: A friend of this website) spoke briefly about what to expect in the coming months:



Highlight:

  • First big fundraising deadline is in less than a month.
Learn more about Bill's campaign here, donate here.