Showing posts with label Laura Pressley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laura Pressley. Show all posts

Thursday, February 7, 2019

#TXLEGE: Watson hijacks Sec'y of State confirmation hearing (to lay foundation for future litigation)


"Do not remove the ancient landmark,
Nor enter the fields of the fatherless;"
Proverbs 23:10

[Note: You can view the committee hearing here; this author's testimony is at the 3:55:30 mark.]

We attended this morning's confirmation hearing for the Secretary of State.  One conclusion is obvious: The Democrats are dead set against this nomination.  And there's litigation coming.

Kirk Watson lead the attack.

Watson subjected Secretary of State Whitley to a barrage of hair-splittingly petty questions about his office's recent efforts to ensure the integrity of Texas' voter rolls.  Whether it was data point "x," data point "y," or data point "z," Watson was on a mission to extract a 'confession' he could exploit for political purposes.  While Watson's strategy is politically obnoxious, it might be very effective legally (especially with a friendly judge).

Every question Watson asked created a new legal "i" to be dotted, or a legal "t" to be crossed.

As for our personal testimony: We discussed how, even if one were to interpret the Secretary of State's numbers in the most unfriendly way possible, there are still enough questionable registrations to matter.  Elections in Travis County are routinely decided by fewer than 5000 votes.  We also noted, tongue somewhat in cheek, that we agreed with Senator Watson's assessment that Texas had serious issues with minority voting rights during the century of Democrat control.

That being said, this nomination's in trouble.  The Texas constitution requires a two thirds vote to confirm gubernatorial appointees.  That means 21 votes.  There are only 19 Republicans.  That means, even if you hold Seliger, you still need two Democrats.  Unfortunately, we think its a lot easier to find 12 votes "against" than it is to find 21 votes "for."  We hope there's a backup plan.

Bottom Line: There's a lot more to come on this issue, but the opening fireworks were nevertheless revealing.... 

Saturday, January 26, 2019

SCOTX validates Pressley's concerns


"Watch, stand fast in the faith, be brave, be strong."
1 Corinthians 16:13

SCOTX released its ruling in Laura Pressley's election challenge:



You should read the whole thing for yourself; the TL,DR version is that the Supreme Court said Pressley raised very valid questions in her election challenge, but that they whole thing is so far in the past that they're not going to do anything about it.

It's similar to the ruling in the Wallace Hall case: validate the argument, then hide behind a technicality.

Non-lawyer opinion: SCOTX's reasoning seems less farcical here than the Hall case.  The term of the seat for which the election contest was originally filed really did expire two years ago.  Refer all your other questions to lawyers.

Casar and his buddies will spin this as a win.  But it's not.  Their macro-strategy is to smear people asking difficult questions as lunatics.  And SCOTX did them no favors there.

Bottom Line: Not everything we wanted, but it's a useful building block....

Monday, September 18, 2017

Citizen Activists catch government with pants down; Government backs off....


"A faithful witness does not lie,
But a false witness will utter lies."
Proverbs 14:5

[Note: Pressley has more on today's hearing here.]

We caught the tail end of a public Secretary of State hearing this morning that illustrates both bureaucratic mendacity and the ability of an engaged citizenry to get the bureaucracy in question to back down.

This past spring, election integrity activist (and former #atxcouncil candidate) Laura Pressley joined with a voting machine vendor to ask the Texas Secretary of State's office (which oversees elections) to permit county election officials to purchase voting machines that would leave create a verifiable paper trail.

When the proposed rule was announced in July, it included a provision that would have significantly weakened provisions requiring 'audit logs' for electronic voting machines.  This would have had the effect of gutting the effort to create a verifiable paper trail for future elections.  Fortunately, Pressley caught the proposed change while reviewing the Texas register (where proposed regulatory changes are first announced to the public).

The bureaucrats in the Secretary of State's office claimed that the petition they received from a different group of bureaucrats elsewhere in the Sec'y of States office was requesting the rule change under consideration; both Pressley and the vendor disputed that account and stated that they only requested the paper trail provision.  At best, it appears that one group of bureaucrats in the Secretary of State's office isn't communicating with a second group of bureaucrats in the Secretary of State's office.  Fortunately, the Secretary of State's office backed down and agreed to drop the 'audit log' provision.

We haven't been in particularly close contact with Pressley (outside of seeing her at occasional social functions) for about a year.  Thus we walked into today's hearing cold, with no knowledge of the specific issue that led to today's hearing.  Furthermore, we were 40 minutes late today.

Coming into today's hearing cold led us to observe body language and vocal tone much more closely than we would normally.  We were struck by the amount of passive-aggressive lawyer talk used by the bureaucrats, while they attempted to shift blame to other folks in the Secretary of State's office.  Pressley, by contrast, had a calm and reasonable demeanor throughout.

Bottom Line: The good guys won one!!!


Wednesday, May 24, 2017

#TXLEGE: Another issue where Abbott's actions don't match his words....


"For you were hypocrites in your hearts when you sent me to the Lord your God, saying, ‘Pray for us to the Lord our God, and according to all that the Lord your God says, so declare to us and we will do it.’ "
Jeremiah 42:20

We haven't had the bandwidth to cover election integrity issues this session, but we signed this letter and ABSOLUTELY concur:

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Texas Secretary of State holds hearing on electronic voting machines



"You shall not steal, nor deal falsely, nor lie to one another."
Leviticus 19:11

Should Texans have the same degree of confidence in the integrity of their elections as residents of New Hampshire?!?

This afternoon, the Texas Secretary of state held public hearings on certification for two types of electronic voting machines.  It was a flashpoint for concerns from activists around Texas over questions that have recently emerged over the reliability of said machines.  Literally zero people testified in favor of electronic machines.

Speakers universally spoke in favor of some form of paper balloting.  As Katie Brewer of Texans for Accountable government explained: "I don't write code, but I can count paper ballots."  Speakers pointed out that, in the event paper ballots became the standard, people would come out of the woodworks to help count them.

The most compelling speaker was Kurt Hyde, a Denton county activist who "began the paper trail movement in 1986."  As Hyde continued, "nothing in that time has changed my mind."  Hyde detailed how counting paper ballots can be accomplished in a timely manner.  Hyde also pointed out that New Hampshire has had a paper trail law on the books since 1994.

The New Hampshire law got us thinking.  Obviously, we just came through a presidential primary where both parties' nomination contests featured accusation of election fraud.  But we didn't remember any accusations related to the contest in New Hampshire.  Google confirmed it.

Laura Pressley said "the Texas Secretary of State does not have public trust" and gave several reasons related to her election challenge:

  • A cast vote record is not a ballot image.
  • Poll watchers were kicked out of the election office in Dallas county on the night of the primary.
  • The Sec'y of state's office has granted numerous waivers related to election integrity matters.
While we didn't catch the CV of the woman who conducted the hearing, it is worth pointing out that nobody from the Secretary of State's election division showed up.

Bottom Line: Paper ballots aren't perfect, but they'd be a heck of a lot better than the mess in which we find ourselves today.

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

3rd Court of Appeals hears Laura Pressley


"You shall not steal, nor deal falsely, nor lie to one another."
Leviticus 19:11

3rd Court of Appeals -- This afternoon, the 3rd Court of Appeals hear Laura Pressley's appeal of the summary judgement issued last year in her election contest against Greg Casar.  If Pressley's appeal is successful, it would remand the case back to the trial court for a full trial.  Most importantly, re-instating Pressley's lawsuit would resume the process of discovery that was aborted with the summary judgement.

Judge Melissa Goodwin voiced concerns about whether or not proceeding with Pressley's lawsuit would "disenfranchise voters."  Pressley's attorney, David Rogers, correctly pointed out that the voters were already disenfranchised when "Travis County dropped the ball."  Travis County disenfranchised the voters with their failure to follow Texas Election Code; holding Travis County accountable for their actions doesn't disenfranchise anything.

The case hinges on the difference between 'ballot images' and 'cast vote records.'  During the recount, Travis County was able to produce the latter but not the former.  Cast vote records are a tally sheet for total votes cast.  Ballot images are manuscripts of how individual voters voted.  Consider the difference:


Casar's lawyer claimed a "CVR is the same thing as a ballot image."  Obviously, that isn't true.  Pressley's lawyers explained that the whole point of the recount was to verify what the cast vote records were claiming.  That's why you need the ballot images.  That's why we're here.

The other major issue was the fact that Travis County didn't print out 'zero tapes' during early voting.  Zero tapes are the daily election results for each polling location.  The Texas Election Code requires election judges to print zero tapes DAILY during early voting.  Casar's lawyer pointed out that the secretary of state had granted Travis County a waiver from this provision.  Of course, waiver or no, that doesn't change the fact that Travis County failed to follow Texas Election Code (Sidenote; That the Sec'y of State is advising counties to break the law is the subject for another day.)

The final issue concerned the financial sanctions the trial court placed on Pressley and her lawyer.  Rogers pointed out how most of the alleged  issues that led to the sanctions had never occurred.  Discussing these issues, Casar's attorney spoke in favor of the sanctions to prevent the "dangerous" precedent of candidates filing election challenges.

At the end of the day, victory would mean returning this case to the lower court to hold a full trial.  Most important, it would re-open the process of discovery that the summary judgement short-circuited.  The Court of Appeals should rule in about a month.

Thursday, March 17, 2016

Detailing Election Irregularities in Texas' 2016 Primary


"You shall not steal, nor deal falsely, nor lie to one another."
Leviticus 19:11

From Laura Pressley:
Breaking News for 2016 Primaries:  Similar Illegalities and serious election irregularities, that occurred in Pressley's election, recently recurred in Texas counties during the 2016 Primaries. 
  • Hart InterCivic electronic voting machines, used in over 100 counties in Texas, do not store ballot images as required by law for recounts, 
  • Poll Watchers witnessed more corruption errors on main tabulation computers on election night, 
  • Texas Secretary of State's Election Division issued waivers for counties to not print backup/results tapes for Early Voting and Election Day before equipment left the polling places, 
  • Secretary of State's Election Division issued waivers to all 254 Texas counties to not audit paper ballot results, 
  • Poll watchers were obstructed from monitoring main tabulation computers on Election Day, 
  • A county refused to post precinct results and attempted to charge a fee for official precinct level Early and Election Day voting results as required by law, and 
  • Votes were flipped on computer screens.
Read the whole thing here.

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Texas' COMPROMISED Elections


"You shall not steal, nor deal falsely, nor lie to one another."
Leviticus 19:11

From Senator Hall:
Texas election laws are not being followed in many counties. Without this consistency, and with the "it's the way we do it" attitude, this has greatly opened the door to fraud. The true intent of the Legislature was to ensure voter integrity at the highest expectation is achieved. Unwarranted waivers allowing election officials to ignore law that was intended to protect the integrity of elections and a blatant disregard for the intent of the legislature is creating unprecedented opportunity for voting fraud in Texas.

Because current Texas election practices and procedures are inconsistent, it is not possible to truthfully validate any election result or conduct a legally sufficient ballot recount in the Texas counties where “electronic” voting, without a paper trail, is being allowed. The procedures for assuring vote integrity, which are clearly stated in the Texas Constitution and Texas Election Code are not being followed.

Texas election laws mandate a system of checks and balances that include paper and electronic tabulation of election results when the polls open and close to prevent fraud and corruption of votes cast electronically. Specifically, Chapters 65 and 66 of the Texas Election Code provide that when polls close, precinct election returns (Results/Tally tapes) are to be printed, signed, and distributed into official election envelopes at the polling location, prior to the equipment leaving the building.

....

Currently, there are at least four different procedures being followed throughout Texas with regard to retention of paper backup election records for electronic voting. Many counties conduct precinct level voting.

Some of these counties print the tapes and some do not. Likewise, there are counties using countywide voting locations. Some of them print tapes and some do not. Without the printed tapes there is no way to validate the computerized election results. These inconsistencies in election record retention are breeding ground for election fraud and is an unacceptable practice for anyone who believes in the rule of law. Unfortunately many of these inconsistencies are driven by waiver letters, which direct counties to ignore the above election laws. These waivers are being provided by the Texas Secretary of State’s Election Division Office.

....

Regardless if Texas counties use precinct voting locations or countywide voting locations, all Texas counties should consistently instruct their election judges to a) print and sign Zero Tapes when the polls open for early voting and on election day, and b) print and sign precinct returns (audit tapes/Tally/Results tapes) directly when the polls close at the polling location, when the polls close for early voting and on election day.

In addition, the Secretary of State’s office should cease issuing waivers that instruct county election officials to operate elections unlawfully and in an inconsistent manner across the state. Vote integrity is one of the most sacred responsibilities of our government. Without integrity, we have no legitimate government.
Read the whole thing here.

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

The Latest on Laura Pressley's election challenge


"You shall not steal, nor deal falsely, nor lie to one another."
Leviticus 19:11

Laura Pressley spoke at last night's Texans for Accountable Government meeting and gave an update on the status of her election challenge:



Highlights:

  • Filed their appeal a couple weeks ago.
  • Oral arguments in front of 3rd court of appeals sometime in November/December
  • Judges for her appeal will be Melissa Goodwin, Bob Pemberton, and David Pureyear.
  • Rosemary Lehmberg would have to file any criminal charges against relevant county officials, which ain't gonna happen.
  • She's put $67k of her own money into this case.
  • Court fined her lawyer $50k for taking the case.
  • Greg Casar's lawyer: "We want to chill" any future election challenges.
In addition, Laura has released this one page summary of the facts behind her case:

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Laura Pressley discusses Election Challenge



"Watch, stand fast in the faith, be brave, be strong."
1 Corinthians 16:13

Tres Amigos Restaurant -- Last Sunday, Laura Pressley held a public event to explain the details of her challenge to last December's election "results."  There were several strange elements about the results.  Pressley's event below:







Highlights:

  • Never printed out nightly election results.
  • More ballots than voters in every precinct.
  • Over 100 votes that shouldn't be there.
  • Recount was "really interesting."
    • Couldn't print ballots.
  • BALLOTS BY MAIL CAME IN AT EXACTLY 240/240.
    • Disconnect between mail-in (ie. Paper) and electronic ballots.
  • Polling locations were closed.
  • Checks and balances that were designed to be there weren't followed.
  • State requires a NON-TRAVIS COUNTY JUDGE!!!
    • Author's note: Cue happy dance.
Bottom Line: By itself, the fact that the mail-in ballots came out exactly even while there was a 2 to 1 difference in the electronic totals, STINKS.  Even if the election stands, this will help clean up Travis County elections in the Future.  Kudos to Laura for taking up this fight....

Monday, January 5, 2015

Having found "irregularities", Laura Pressley demands recount


"Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord,
But a just weight is His delight."
Proverbs 11:1

Sweet:
Laura Pressley has requested a recount of the vote in the District 4 Austin City Council runoff.

The official results for the Dec. 16 election put Pressley at 35.39 percent of the vote, or 1,563 ballots, compared to Greg Casar’s 64.61 percent of the vote, or 2,854 ballots. Pressley submitted a recount petition to the city Friday, the deadline to do so.

The petition states that there are several “inconsistencies” with the results. Pressley said that there appear to be mail-in ballots counted more than once during early voting, and that the number of ballots cast in certain precincts during early voting was greater than the number of early voters included on a list that the county provided to her campaign.

The petition asks for a manual recount of ballots cast in 18 precincts on election day, as well as ballots cast during early voting and by mail. The petition says that ballot images are kept on Travis County’s voting machines and asks for a recount using the images. The petition asks that the voter name on each ballot image be reconciled with that voter’s registration number and signature on the form used at polling places.

....

Pressley has until 5 p.m. Monday, per state law, to submit an amended petition with a $13,600 deposit. Pressley said she will refile the petition with the larger deposit and said the money will come from her campaign funds.
Read the whole think here.

We saw Laura earlier today at Ken Paxton's swearing in ceremony and she told us her next stop was to drop off a check for the balance owed.

And yes, this does mean that Casar won't be sworn in until after the recount.

#RecountParty

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Casar under performs Obama by Eleven Points!!!


"Therefore if they say to you, ‘Look, He is in the desert!’ do not go out; or ‘Look, He is in the inner rooms!’ do not believe it."
Matthew 24:26

A source e-mails:


Readers can view election results here; view district 4 boundaries here.

In other Casar related news, Battleground Texas let the cat out of the bag this morning:



That Casar received major league support from Battleground Texas has to be the least surprising news of this whole campaign; personally, we find it telling that neither side mentioned this until after the election.

Bottom Line: Not only did Battleground Texas get smoked statewide on November 4th.  Not only did three Republicans get elected to the Austin City Council last night.  But, even in their consolation prize in Northeast Austin, Battleground Texas' new golden boy trailed the previous golden boy by double digits.

#HAILSATANTX

Monday, December 1, 2014

Austin City Council, District 4: The Facts


"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2

Laura Pressley's campaign has released this infograph contrasting herself and her opponent:

Comparisons

Laura's campaign has also released this video:



Highlights:
  • No joking, no hanky-panky, let's get to work.
  • She has a stake in the city.
  • Opponent doesn't pay property taxes and has only voted one time!!!
  • Laura's "not bought and sold."
  • Laura won't get brainwashed on council.
A small business owner and taxpayer vs. an unemployed prep-school socialist...the choice is yours district 4!!

-----

Read our previous endorsement of Laura here.

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Former rival endorses Laura Pressley!!!


"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2

Fantastic:



Highlights:
  • Austin was affordable 26 years ago; it isn't now.
  • A single mother should be able to afford to live here.
  • Laura has "the drive, that spirit, to represent this district in the right, correct way it needs to be."
  • District 4 has been "left behind" in infrastructure for 20 years.
  • District 4 vulnerable to gentrification.

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Why you should vote for Laura Pressley


"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2

The Statesman gave City Council candidates on minute to make a closing argument; here's Laura Pressley from District 4:



Highlights:
  • Lived in Austin 26 years.
  • Affordability plans:
    • Reduce utility rates by eliminating fees not based on useage.
    • 20% homestead exemption.
  • Pay for Homestead exemption by cutting corporate subsidies.

Monday, October 20, 2014

Austin City Council: Conservative/Libertarian Voter Guide


"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2

Author's Note: Readers can find their Austin City Council District here; readers can find TCRP's endorsement spreadsheet here.

With early voting set to commence in Austin's historic 10-1 election, the 78 candidates currently running can be intimidating.  Here at Cahnman's Musings, we've been studying these races for months.  We endorse the following candidates:

District 1 -- (Far Northeast Austin): Michael Cargill


Texas Firearms Celebrity Michael Cargill was the first federally licensed firearms dealer to accept BITCOIN in his store.  That, by itself, should tell you everything you need to know about him.  In a city where entrenched special interests are abusing the political process to preserve their status, Cargill's actions illustrate his commitment to genuine innovation.

Cargill has been a fixture in local politics for some time.  In 2012, he ran against an incumbent Travis County constable who had previously accepted money from drug cartels.  Unfortunately, a la Rosemary Lehmberg, the Democrat machine rallied around their incumbent.  In 2013, Cargill was a critical presence in the successful campaign against the Austin ISD bond.  He has a documented history of taking on petty tyrants.

Cargill is running on a platform of fiscal responsibility and reducing traffic.  He has signed the Citizens for Tax Relif NOW pledge.  He has also been endorsed by Texans for Accountable Government (TAG). Specifically, he has proposed widening 183 as a free road and relocating City of Austin offices from downtown to the outskirts of the city.   Cargill will also protect our second amendment rights from gun grabbing politicians at the local level.

Avoid: DeWayne Lofton -- Supports the rail bond.

District 2 -- (Southeast Austin): They All Suck.

District 3 -- (Central East Austin): Kent Philips

A former regional coordinator for Debra Medina, Kent Phillips is running to lower Austin's cost of living by eliminating wasteful spending and burdensome regulations.  Kent intends to audit the city budget, implement zero-based budgeting, and pass budgets at the effective tax rate.  Kent understands that the root cause of Austin's current affordability challenges is a City Council (and County and School District) that regulates too much, spends too much, and taxes too much.

Endorsed by TAG, Kent is a regular attendee at Liberty on the Rocks and other liberty themed events around Austin.

As a rapidly gentrifying part of town, affordability challenges are especially poignant in District 3.  We should know, this is our home district.  We intend to vote for Kent Philips and you should as well.

Avoid: Susana Almanza -- Supports $15 hr minimum wage; remember, this one's personal.

District 4 -- (North Central Austin): Laura Pressley

The best prepared and most knowledgeable candidate in this district, Laura Pressley is the clear choice in District 4.  A 26 year Austin resident, Laura was instrumental in passing 10-1.  She has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Laura ran against Mike Martinez in 2012.  She supports a 20% homestead exemption and reduction (Author's note: preferably elimination) of corporate subsidies.  She has spoken previously about cost saving measures at Austin Energy.

Laura has previously supported Ron Paul and has earned the endorsement of TAG.  She intends to curb the "we're rich" culture of spending at City Hall. Pressley is the candidate in district 4 most clearly committed to the fiscal pruning City Hall desperately needs.

Avoid: Gregorio Casar -- A Leftist Demagogue in the mold of Julian Castro and Hugo Chavez who has raised serious money.

District 5 (South Central Austin): Mike Rodriguez

Another longtime 10-1 advocate, Mike Rodriguez knows the City of Austin's budget in more detail than anyone this author has ever met.  He's been studying the City of Austin's culture of overspending for decades.  And it shows.

Mike wants lower cost of living by reducing burdensome regulations.  He specifically cites Project Connect, Code Next, and Imagine Austin.  He has been endorsed by Texans for Fiscal Responsibility (TFR) and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Mike says it best on his website: "Rather than always thinking of what more government can do, Mike will stay focused on the need to limit any added burden on our taxpayers and renters."

District 6 (Far Northwest Austin): Jay Wiley

Jay Wiley got in this race over a year ago.  He's raised more money than all the other candidates combined.  He's been endorsed by TFR and was the first candidate in the race to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.  While there are other fantastic candidates in this district, this isn't their time or race.  Don't try to get cute.  If conservative voters are smart, this can be an easy win.  Vote with your head, not your heart.



District 7 (North Austin): Ed English

In a race full of career bureaucrats, Ed English is the only candidate in District 7 to have worked in the real world.  A successful businessman, Ed led the fight to pass 10-1.  As a leader of Austinites for Geographic Representation, he donated "several thousand hours" over a "two year period".

Ed is running to eliminate wasteful spending and give hard working taxpayers "real relief."  He understand that excessive regulation, excessive spending, and excessive taxation are the root cause of Austin's affordability challenges.  He also opposed boondoggles like water treatment plant #4 and the biomass plant.

Finally, Ed is the only district 7 candidate who lives north of 183.  This is an important advantage, considering that two thirds of the district is north of 183.  He has also signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

District 8 (Southwest Austin): Ellen Troxclair

Ellen Troxclair has been called "a spending hawk."  She's also been called "a suburban pit bull."  We have another title for the list: Ellen Troxclair is a femme fatale for bloated government.

Considering the demographics of the district and her issue positions relative to the other candidates, supporting Ellen is the easiest decision in the city.  District 8 is a 50/50 district, and Ellen is the only conservative candidate in the race.  In addition to working as a realtor, Ellen is a former chief of staff to State Rep Jason Isaac and has been endorsed by TFR and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Traffic congestion is, easily and by far, the biggest problem in district 8.  Ellen has pledged to start with "with improving our road system....Money spent on transportation solutions should focus on getting the greatest number of people to the most in-demand locations. To help with the congestion, we must increase our road capacity, improve our bus service to the region, and allow for innovate transportation options such as Lyft and Uber."

District 9 (Central Austin): Erin McGann

Erin McGann is the only candidate running in district 9 who isn't an incumbent.  That should tell you everything you need to know.  She's been endorsed by TFR and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Erin is the only candidate in district 9 to oppose the current rail boondoggle.  Erin supports cost effective traffic solutions like traffic-light synchronization and expanded bus service.  She also opposes corporate-welfare masquerading as "business incentives."

Regarding affordability and the central premise of her campaign, Erin writes: "Current City Council doesn’t seem to understand the correlation between increased taxes and affordability. When Council approves more spending, higher utilities or taxes, the level of affordability decreases, and yet Council continues to pay lip service to affordability while increasing spending.  We need prioritize the basic needs of Austin – fix our roads and sidewalks, encourage and improve middle-income apartments and condos, the increase the number of multi-bedroom units for families, keep utility rates low, fund our first responders and end corporate subsidies."

Avoid: Riley and Tovo are both AWFUL!!!

District 10 (West Austin): Bill Worsham

While there are several candidates with a Republican voting history in district 10, Bill is the most solidly conservative.  He's been endorsed by TFR and TAG and was the first candidate in district 10 to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.  As a civil engineer, Bill's professional background leaves him uniquely suited to understand the technical details of Austin's transportation challenges.

On transportation, Bill supports expanding our road and highway network.  He supports ridesharing and cost effective solutions like traffic light synchronization.  He does not support the current rail proposal.

Bill understands how regulation and taxation indirectly inflates housing costs.  He is specifically committed to reducing red tape for restaurant owners.  He's the candidate best positioned to give the Austin City Council the radical course correction it needs next January.

Avoid: Robert Thomas -- Claims to be a fiscal conservative but brags about sitting on the Austin ISD bond committee on his campaign website.


Mayor (Citywide): Todd Phelps

With Adler virtually guaranteed to make the runoff, there's no reason not to swing for the fences in the first round of the mayoral race.  Unlike the "big three," Todd Phelps opposes the current urban rail boondoggle.  He was the first mayoral candidate to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

Avoid: Mike Martinez -- The worst member of the current council.








Bond Initiatives -- Vote AGAINST all:
  • Prop. 1 City of Austin (Urban Rail)
  • Prop. 1 ACC
  • Prop. 2 ACC
  • Prop. 1 State of Texas ("Transportation")

Thursday, October 16, 2014

7 Candidates Sign Citizens for Tax Relief Taxpayer Protection Pledge


"But the former governors who were before me laid burdens on the people, and took from them bread and wine, besides forty shekels of silver. Yes, even their servants bore rule over the people, but I did not do so, because of the fear of God. "
Nehemiah 5:15

Wowzers!!!
In the first 24 hours of making our tax relief pledge public, SEVEN candidates for Austin City Council have signed!

The signers include:

Ed English - District 7
Laura Pressley - District 4
Erin McGann - District 9
Jason Denny - District 5
Jay Wiley - District 6
Bill Worsham - District 10
Ellen Troxclair - District 8

These candidates are committing to bring accountability to City Hall and tax relief to Austin residents. We are encouraged by the rapid support for the three tenants of the pledge:

1. Audit the City of Austin
Support and advocate for an independent operational and financial audit of all city departments and functions.

2. 20% Homestead Exemption
Support and advocate for immediate tax relief for homeowners by implementing the full 20% Homestead Exemption.

3. Budget at the Effective Tax Rate
Support and advocate for annual operating budgets that do not exceed the effective tax rate and for zero-based budgeting for all operations.

If you agree with this pledge and want to see real change come to City Hall, please forward it to every Austin voter you know. Then, "LIKE" our Facebook page -- we'll keep you posted on City Council candidates who sign the pledge so you who will take REAL steps to lower your cost of living.

Don't use Facebook? Then go to our website and click on Candidate Pledge to see who has signed.

Citizens for Tax Relief NOW is a citizen-led grassroots group that wants to make sure people like you get REAL tax relief on Election Day, not more hyperbole.

--> DON'T FORGET! Election Day is November 4, and early voting runs from Oct. 20-31.

To see who's on the ballot in the Council District where you live, CLICK HERE.

Thank you, and God bless!

Cindy Mallette
Organizer, Citizens for Tax Relief NOW
www.citizensfortaxreliefnow.com
cindymallette@gmail.com

Friday, October 10, 2014

Citizens for Tax Relief NOW releases Austin Taxpayer Protection Pledge


"But the former governors who were before me laid burdens on the people, and took from them bread and wine, besides forty shekels of silver. Yes, even their servants bore rule over the people, but I did not do so, because of the fear of God."
Nehemiah 5:15

FAN-TAS-TIC:
No doubt you're feeling the strain of how expensive a place Austin has become. The good news is, in a few weeks you can change the balance of power at Austin City Hall. You'll finally have the chance to see Austin become a more affordable city.

Citizens for Tax Relief NOW is a citizen-led grassroots group that wants to make sure people like you get REAL tax relief on Election Day, not more hyperbole.

Right now, we are sending out a candidate pledge to all 78 City Council candidates asking them to sign if they agree that tax relief will make Austin more affordable.

The pledge says:

I, _________________, pledge to support and advocate for a more affordable community as a member of Austin City Council. Greater transparency and financial accountability will ultimately result in a more affordable, thriving community, and in order to achieve this, I pledge to support and advocate for the following actions:

1. Audit the City of Austin
Support and advocate for an independent operational and financial audit of all city departments and functions.

2. Enact a 20% Homestead Exemption

Support and advocate for immediate tax relief for homeowners by implementing the full 20% Homestead Exemption.

3. Budget at the Effective Tax Rate

Support and advocate for annual operating budgets that do not exceed the effective tax rate and for zero-based budgeting for all operations.

If you agree with this message, please forward it to every Austin voter you know. Then, "LIKE" our Facebook page -- we'll keep you posted on City Council candidates who sign the pledge so you who will take REAL steps to lower your cost of living.

Don't use Facebook? Then go to our website and click on Candidate Pledge to see who has signed.

DON'T FORGET! Election Day is November 4, and early voting runs from Oct. 20-31.

To see who's on the ballot in the Council District where you live, CLICK HERE.

Thank you, and God bless!

Cindy Mallette

Organizer, Citizens for Tax Relief NOW
www.citizensfortaxreliefnow.com
cindymallette@gmail.com
As of the time of this publication, Laura Pressley (District 4) and Ed English (District 7) are the first two candidates to sign.