Showing posts with label Ted Roosevelt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ted Roosevelt. Show all posts

Monday, July 13, 2020

Bonnen and Ramsey ratchet up the gaslighting


"Behold, the noise of the report has come,
And a great commotion out of the north country,
To make the cities of Judah desolate, a den of jackals."
Jeremiah 10:22


Dennis Bonnen yesterday:

After more than 20 years in the Texas political arena, I know that, sadly, our state (and maybe even our species) is overpopulated with critics and naysayers who find it easier to disparage the efforts of leaders than to affirm and encourage them as they do what is right for the whole state, not just their particular political sect. (Incidentally, some of them have made a very nice living doing so.)

In the very recent past, the critics have come out in force to disparage and censure one of the great governors our state has known. I think of Governor Greg Abbott when I read the rest of the quote:

“The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.“
Theodore Roosevelt
Today, as our state battles a resurgent pandemic, political nincompoops have chosen to waste time and energy drafting resolutions to censure a man who has been working around the clock for the past four months to protect our state from a deadly virus.
Ross Ramsey this morning:

The trolls are real.

Gov. Greg Abbott is feeling the derision of restive activists in his own party.

They’re noisy — and powerless. They work with the same machinery used by trolls on social media, who labor in the hope that public shaming of their enemies might give them the leverage to shape the world, or some corner of it.

The Texas trolls want to ignore the governor’s latest restrictions for wearing masks and keeping social distance and closing bars as the measures of the pandemic worsen. Abbott folded when confronted by people protesting business closings in May but this time is ignoring them, and responding to the coronavirus as a big deal — a task worth his government’s time and attention.
You get the picture.

The sentiment isn't surprising. For Dennis Bonnen and Ross Ramsey to be condescending and smug is expected. That being said, the vitriol IS noteworthy. Clearly, something is getting under their skin.

This is especially true for Ross Ramsey. While his so-called 'analysis' is often cliched and trite, he's usually nice about it. In nearly a decade of reading his columns, we've never seen him lose his cool like this.

Besides being funny, Dennis Bonnen's thin-skinned brownnosing isn't all that noteworthy on its own. Coupled with Ramsey, however, it's a trend. Somebody's spooked about something.

Bottom Line: Sometimes, the reaction of other people highlights something you would have otherwise missed.

Friday, March 21, 2014

Democrat Dallas County Judge Commends Katrina Pierson


"For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, says the Lord, thoughts of peace and not of evil, to give you a future and a hope."
Jeremiah 29:11

Dallas County Democrats haven't covered themselves in glory this week, but this is a classy move:


In other Katrina news, she had a stellar appearance on Fox earlier this week:

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Book Review: The Road to Freedom -- How to Win the Fight for Free Enterprise, by Arthur Brooks



"Because what's at stake is whether this will be a country where working people can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home, secure their retirement."
- Barack Obama, Osawatomie Kansas Speech, December 2011.


The above quote illustrates the disadvantage many conservatives place themselves into when discussing economics.  Where Marxists argue in dishonest moral terms, advocates of free enterprise often reply with materialistic arguments about economic efficiency.  As Arthur Brooks illustrates in The Road to Freedom, for advocates of rewarding merit with earned success to concede any moral argument to dishonest advocates of forced confiscation at gunpoint is both insane and unnecessary.

Free Enterprise, a system that allows people to earn their success via merit, lifts people out of subsistence level despair.  Marxism, a system that confiscates the earned property of citizens at gunpoint to redistribute it to politically favored constituencies, leads to tyranny, starvation, and economic devastation.  Why would any sensible person choose the latter?!?

Brooks' central point is that Free Enterprise allows people to earn their success via merit.  As Brooks illustrates:
To earn your success is to define and pursue your happiness as [God and] you see fit....Earned success is what the Founders were talking about in the Declaration of Independence....The Founders didn't guarantee happiness.  They didn't ever say people have the right to happiness.  They said they have the right to pursue [italics in original] happiness....Their visionary insight was that allowing us to earn our success is precisely what gives each of us the best chance at achieving real happiness. (24/5)
 Free Enterprise is the only system that allows people to pursue happiness on whatever terms God and they see fit, "the system that offered a chance to find the soul in my work -- through first hand experience." (32)

Marxism, by contrast, creates in citizens a condition of learned helplessness.  When governments confiscate earned success at gunpoint and redistribute it to politically favored constituencies, "people simply give up and stop trying to succeed." (30)  That exactly what's happened under Barack Obama.  Millions of people have stopped trying to earn success, and have instead joined politically favored constituencies.  This isn't an accident, it's part of the Marxist design.

At this point, it's important to distinguish between free enterprise and crony capitalism.  Free enterprise allows people to succeed or fail based on merit.  Crony capitalism, on the other hand, enables unearned success based on proximity to government officials.  Crony capitalism is actually a form of Marxism: "[C]orporate cronyism, like statism, is just another way to wreck competition and freedom." (64)  Unfortunately, while Democrats are uniformly terrible on this issue, far too many Republicans (with the notable exceptions of Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan) from Ted Roosevelt to George W. Bush, have jumped on the crony capitalist bandwagon.

Brooks' final point is that free enterprise actually benefits those with the fewest resources the most.  Those currently at the bottom of the wealth scale will have far greater opportunities to improve their lots over the 40 to 60 years they work under free enterprise, as opposed to Marxism.  Put simply, poor people need jobs not food stamps.  Furthermore, free enterprise is the only system that creates enough individual wealth to enable meaningful charity: "for many people, it [free enterprise] produces a surplus that many will choose to direct to charitable purposes." (81) We can either live in Andrew Carnegie's America, or we can live in Barack Obama's America; we can't have both.

America faces a choice.  On the one hand, we can restore our founding principles and reward merit with earned success.  On the other hand, we can continue down the road of confiscation at gunpoint and forced redistribution that we've been travelling the past 100 years, which Barack Obama has dramatically accelerated.  While lots of literature exists on the economic consequences of this decision, The Road to Freedom is an indispensable guide to the underlying moral issues.  Personally, I think the choice is obvious....

Update: AEI just produced this video: