Showing posts with label Paul Workman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Workman. Show all posts
Friday, September 28, 2018
#atxcouncil, #TribFest 18: Casar admits he's a socialist
"Consider the work of God;
For who can make straight what He has made crooked?"
Ecclesiastes 7:13
It's not a surprise but, at least to this author's knowledge, it's the first time he's admitted it publicly.
This morning, at the Texas Tribune festival, Greg Casar called himself a "proud member" of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Casar's comment came in response to a question from Paul Workman during a panel discussion of the City of Austin's municipal "sick leave" entitlement. Workman asked Casar, point blank, if he was a socialist. Casar momentarily hemmed and hawed, before biting the bullet and giving the answer detailed above.
Like we said: It's not like this is a surprise, but it is the first time (at least to our knowledge) he's admitted it publicly.
Otherwise, the panel was what you'd expect. Rob Henneke of TPPF explained the difference between individual choice and government force. Some form of sick leave probably is a good idea for many employers and many employees. But "many" is not the same thing as all. Government forcing what's good for many onto all is tyranny. As Henneke said, "[I]t's not the roles of cities to regulate anything and everything." Amen.
One comment stood out: Ann Beeson of the Center for Public Policy Priorities, a left-leaning Austin based think tank, said that the fact that many employers already offered this specific benefit meant that all employers should be forced into this policy. Obviously, big businesses using the force of government to impose mandatory costs on its smaller competitors is called economic protectionism. We don't know if Beeson's neglect of this point was due to ignorance or malice. Neither is acceptible.
Bottom Line: At least he's being honest....
Friday, June 1, 2018
#TXLEGE: Israel throws shade on #atxcouncil's "Sick Leave" entitlement; Evan Smith admits Joe Straus is a Liberal
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2
We attended this afternoon's Trib event with Paul Workman and Celia Israel:
Most of the event was fairly predictable. Israel and Workman discussed school finance, immigration, and guns where each said what one would expect someone with their respective partisan affiliations to say. A couple moments, however, did stand out.
During the discussion of the City of Austin's...contentious...relationship with the Legislature, Israel bemoaned the sloppiness of the city's approach to the "sick leave" entitlement. Israel suggested that a slower, more deliberative, approach to the ordinance could have given it stronger legs when it hits the legislature. Specifically, Israel said council "gave Paul Workman a softball." She's right, you know.
During Q&A, we asked both about their thought's on the city's recent stunt over the CodeNext petition. Unfortunately, neither one was familiar enough with the statute in question to comment. We're kicking ourselves over that one because we considered printing it out and handing it to both of them before the event, but we didn't do so.
The best moment came from Evan Smith. During the discussion of the speaker's race, Workman expressed confidence the next speaker would be more conservative than Joe Straus. We didn't write down the exact quote, but Evan Smith's response can roughly be paraphrased as "Well, that's kinda a matter of physics. The only house Republican to the left of Joe Straus is Sarah Davis." Gee Evan, good to hear you finally admit that Joe Straus is a liberal!
Bottom Line: Nothing earth shattering happened, but some interesting tidbits and a good event to have attended.
Thursday, May 31, 2018
#TXLEGE, #atxcouncil: The Costs and Consequences of Municipal "sick leave" Entitlements
"Is it not lawful for me to do as I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good?!?"
Matthew 20:15
We attended this afternoon's TPPF event: The Cost and Consequences of Mandating Paid Sick Leave. The event discussed the municipal entitlement the Austin City Council invented out of thin air last February. Since Austin passed its ordinance, the tentacles are spreading to San Antonio and Dallas.
Tina Greider-Cannon of the Austin Chamber discussed how there were only 19 days between posting the language of the ordinance and final passage. That schedule made it impossible to do a real economic impact study. Cannon furthermore illustrated how, even using the advocates bogus numbers, there was still going to be a net economic impact of at least $140 million. She also mentioned that unionized businesses are carved out of the ordinance.
Don "Skeeter" Miller of the County Line restaurant called the Austin entitlement an "administrative nightmare." To simply consolidate the hours of employees who work at stores both inside and outside the city limits is a daunting task. He also said it would kill their ability to do flexible scheduling for employees. Miller said the minimum cost of the Austin ordinance would be $200,000 per year.
Annie Spilman of the National Federation of Independent Businesses made an interesting point about the vagueness of the ordinance. She suggested it could set employers up for "stings" by various outside groups. Rather than fight a city working in cahoots with the outside groups, employers natural tendency will be to settle. Obviously, this is another form of shakedown.
The most interesting speaker was Paul Workman. Workman talked about how the Austin ordinance was part of a national effort to push socialist economic policies at the local level. Workman pointed out that this was part of a trend along with several other bad city of Austin policies. This was the most perceptive we've seen Workman speak about the groups pushing this nonsense, and we were glad to see it.
Of course, the problem is that this is not our first rodeo with Paul Workman. Paul Workman has been filing bills to reign in the city of Austin for years. Those bills never seem to go anywhere. We asked Workman about that during Q&A. Workman said that because of the new speaker, those bills will start moving. Of course, this brings up certain obvious questions about Workman's previous speaker decisions. But, at this point, dwelling on the past won't accomplish anything moving forward.
Bottom Line: Municipal entitlements are a nightmare for any number of reasons.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
#TXLEGE: How Jay Wiley's Son shaped Jay Wiley's pro-life convictions
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you;
Before you were born I sanctified you;
I ordained you a prophet to the nations.”
Jeremiah 1:5
Jay Wiley is running for the Western Travis County house seat currently occupied by Paul Workman; Wiley explains how a vote Workman took last session to preserve a pro-abortion loophole would have impacted his family:
Highlights:
- While his wife Sally was pregnant with their son Anders, they found out Anders had a heart defect.
- Offered the option of abortion.
- Obviously, they declined.
- Instead, they had heart surgery performed on Anders in utero; that was followed by additional surgeries over the years.
- Despite the challenges, today Anders is a thriving 10 year old.
- Thus, Anders is a textbook example of the type of baby who could be legally aborted under the "fetal abnormality" loophole Paul Workman voted to preserve.
- "Shamefully, liberal Republicans teamed up with Democrats to kill this amendment; Paul Workman was one of those Republicans.
- Workman then had the nerve to make a "journal statement" changing his vote.
- Wiley: "This is an example of the type of cowardice I'm running against in the Texas House."
- "Anders life has no less value than yours or mine."
Monday, November 13, 2017
Abbott goes 1 for 2 in first #TXLEGE endorsement round
"This Book of the Law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate in it day and night, that you may observe to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success."
Joshua 1:8
First off, the FANTASTIC news:
This is fantastic. Sarah Davis is a wretched legislator and an even worse human being. In a world where we're starting to reconsider our longstanding policy of not focusing on personal conduct, Sarah Davis' combination of disgraceful personal conduct and a willingness to play the feminist card whenever someone calls her out politically is a level of hypocrisy that makes her a VERY tempting target.
Furthermore, there's a political angle here that's interesting regardless: Because this is Greg Abbott we're talking about, you know he polled Davis' district for both the primary and the general. For Abbott to move forward here means that his polling said the narrative that "only a moderate can hold this district in the general" is BS. Obviously, someone said that two years ago.
So good on Abbott, and good riddance to Sarah Davis.
But from the Trib article on the Davis announcement, this tidbit:
Abbott made his first endorsement in the 2018 House primaries last week, backing state Rep. Paul Workman, an Austin Republican who authored legislation for Abbott's special session agenda. Workman faces a primary challenger from his right, Jay Wiley.Seriously?!? Paul Workman?!?
As we wrote about Paul last month:
This isn't new. Paul Workman has now served four sessions. After that time, the Austin City Council remains as out of control as ever.That Workman worked with the Governor on a couple of bills that went nowhere (because of the leadership Paul Workman voted for) doesn't offset the fact that the city of Austin now feels safer than ever to thumb their noses at the legislature.
Sigh.
Bottom Line: This is such a typical Abbott thing to do. On the one hand, getting rid of Sarah Davis is a public service for which the Governor deserves commendation. But then he has to go and endorse Paul Workman....
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
#atxcouncil, #TXLEGE: "Sick Leave" mandate makes clear we can no longer afford Paul Workman
"[R]edeeming the time, because the days are evil."
Ephesians 5:16
Since last week's council meeting, we've had a recurring thought: The reason council keeps pushing this nonsense is because they don't fear the legislature. And, for good reason, council will never fear the legislature as long as Joe Straus remains speaker. And Paul Workman is a Straus loyalist....
Last session, Paul Workman filed a bill to eliminate the "ban the box" (note: that didn't actually ban the box) mandate council passed in 2016. The bill stalled in calendars for a month before getting placed on the calendar too late for consideration. Thus, the city of Austin's "ban the box" ordinance stands.
This isn't new. Paul Workman has now served four sessions. After that time, the Austin City Council remains as out of control as ever.
The reason why is obvious: Paul Workman is the least important member of the Travis County delegation, with the possible exception of Dawnna Dukes, to the speaker. The Travis County Democrats are more important members of the speaker's team than Paul Workman. And Joe Straus will always choose the Travis county Democrats over holding the city of Austin accountable.
Obviously, Jay Wiley is running again against Workman. We've yet to decide how we will engage individual legislative races, beyond a general policy of opposing Straus loyalists. But we will add that the personal threat this sick leave mandate poses makes it unacceptable to have a Republican state rep representing any part of the city of Austin who will continue to vote for a speaker who undermines legislative efforts to hold the city of Austin accountable.
Finally, we will give one piece of advice to Jay Wiley: 40% of HD-47 voters live within the city of Austin. We would focus on those precincts with a simple message. As long as Paul Workman remains in the legislature, nothing will change with the city of Austin.
Bottom Line This cannot continue.
Thursday, July 27, 2017
#TXLEGE: Straus mendacious as ever and NEVER going to change (without Gubernatorial intervention).....
"Therefore we also, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which so easily ensnares us, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us,"
Hebrews 12:1
[UPDATE: According to Empower Texans, Workman withdrew the amendment voluntarily so Straus didn't have to rule it non-germane. That's a separate hot mess (as is the fact that NO Freedom Caucus member advanced their own amendment to force the issue), but it's not lawlessness in the way we'd originally reported. We've updated the post accordingly.]
-----
While we've had our suspicions about what would happen, to this point in the special session we've been content to let the process play out. We knew the time would come when events would paint a clear picture. That happened today.
HB 7 (Phelan) is a pathetic impersonation of the tree bill that Governor Abbott has requested from the legislature. It was heard alongside the real tree bill in the urban affairs committee on Tuesday [Note: We signed in against but did not testify]. The difference between Phelan's bill and the real tree bill is that Phelan's was voted out while the real tree bill languishes in committee.
But here's the real kicker: This was a reprise of a bill that was vetoed by the Governor in June; as the Governor explained:
Senate Bill 744 appears to be a compromise bill that imposes a very minor restriction on some municipal tree ordinances. But in doing so, it gives the imprimatur of state law to the municipal micromanagement of private property, which should be abolished altogether. This bill was well-intentioned, but by the end of the legislative process it actually ended up doing more to protect cities than it did to protect the rights of property owners.Obviously, the disrespect was deliberate.
But hope had yet to be lost; Paul Workman was planning to use a floor amendment to attach the real tree bill to Phelan's shell bill.
Then Workman inexplicably withdrew his amendment. And the House members did nothing. And NO Freedom Caucus member offered their own amendment to force the issue. Ultimately, 132 members (including five from the Freedom caucus) voted to pass Phelan's bill without any amendments.
- Note: Making matters that much more interesting, on the modestly pro-life bill the House considered next, Straus had no problem allowing Democrats to put forward three amendments to weaken the bill
-----
So, where do we go from here?!?
Honestly...it's up to Abbott. It's his agenda that's on the line. And he's the one who was explicitly dissed today.
If Abbott gets actively involved, plenty of time remains to go 20 for 20.
If Abbott doesn't get actively involved, according to Capitol sources, Straus only intends to move: the less important pro-life items (note: looks good on a campaign mailer), annexation (note: being from San Antonio, Straus personally needs this), something related to school finance (note: he'll push for the Huberty bill then settle for an interim study) and maternal mortality.
Absent Abbott's involvement, everything else is dead in the House.
-----
Governor Greg Abbott: (512) 463-2000
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
#TXLEGE: First major #SpecialSession day of House committee hearings.....
"Oh, let the nations be glad and sing for joy!
For You shall judge the people righteously,
And govern the nations on earth. Selah"
Psalm 67:4
[Note: We'll post links to the videos as they become available.]
The House had its first major day of committee hearings today. We signed up to testify on seven bills and deliverd that testimony on four. Bills we support will be listed in green, bills about which we are neutral will be listed in yellow, and bills we oppose will be listed in red.
- HB 70 (Workman): "Relating to a property owner's right to remove a tree or vegetation."
We testified in favor of the House version of the tree bill in the Urban Affairs committee. We echoed the property rights related arguments you've seen delivered elsewhere. We also pointed out that trees usually add value to a property, which means that property owners rarely want to cut them down, but in the cases where it's necessary they shouldn't have to wade through a cumbersome process to do so.
But, let's be honest: This is not the first time this author has testified in front of the Urban Affairs committee this session. We testified in favor of two separate property rights related bills in this committee during the regular session, and the Democrat committee chair refused to vote either one out of committee. As chair of the urban affairs committee, Carol Alvarado has a bad recent record on moving property rights related bills.
- HB 71 (Bohac): "Relating to the limitation on increases in the appraised value of a residence homestead for ad valorem taxation."
We testified in favor of this bill in the Ways and Means committee. To be honest, we were pleasantly surprised that Dennis Bonnen chose to give it a hearing. It's well within the bounds of the special session call.
The short version of why we support this bill is because there's two places to reign in the property tax system: the appraisal and the rate; while we fully support the discussion related to tax rates that's been generating more attention, we'd also love to do something about the appraisal system.
- HB 124 (GREG Bonnen): "Relating to the date for ordering or holding an election to ratify the ad valorem tax rate of a school district."
We signed up to testify on this bill in Ways and Means but were out of the room when our name was called.
This bill would require tax ratification elections for school districts to be held alongside November general elections; this would make it harder for school districts to game the system by calling tax ratification elections at strange time where only district employees show up to vote.
- HJR 18 (Howard): "Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the state to pay at least 50 percent of the cost of maintaining and operating the public school system and prohibiting the comptroller from certifying legislation containing an appropriation unless the requirement is met."
We testified neutrally on this bill in the Appropriations committee.
As we explained in our testimony in the school finance testimony yesterday, we don't think it's entirely crazy to say that the state should pick up a greater share of the education tab. But, for that deal to make sense, the additional state funding needs to be accompanied by some form of structural reform to the system or dollar for dollar reductions in local property taxes (preferably both). But the house seems to really, really want to do a school finance package and we want to make clear what we would need to see to become interested.
- HB 80 (Darby): "Relating to a cost-of-living adjustment applicable to certain benefits paid by the Teacher Retirement System of Texas."
We were out of the room when we were called to testify on this bill in Appropriation but we oppose it because it pours more money into the current broken system without any reform.
Appropriations also considered multiple bills related to raiding the rainy day fund to pay for teacher health care, which would be a terrible idea.
- HB 3 (Dennis Bonnen): "Relating to ad valorem taxation; authorizing fees."
This is the property tax transparency bill Bonnen started pushing late in the regular session when the he was unable to get the automatic rollback election bill out of his committee. We testified in favor of the bill as an improvement over current law. But we also made it clear that we did not consider this bill sufficient to call the 85th legislative session successful on property taxes.
This led to a moderately contentious exchange with Bonnen about the relative merits of transparency vs. automatic rollbacks. Bonnen attempted to argue that we were saying that we'd be fine with taxing entities raising taxes just up to the limit into perpetuity. We pointed out to the chairman that moving from a forgiveness based system to a permission based system was the biggest thing anyone was discussing at the moment.
Another fun fact we realized after discussion of this bill: Mayor Adler also testified in favor of this bill; while this isn't the first time Mayor Adler and this author have agreed on an issue, the fact that he's supporting it should tell you everything you need to know about the practical effect it will have.
- HB 4 (Dennis Bonnen): "Relating to the calculation of the ad valorem rollback tax rate of a taxing unit and voter approval of a proposed tax rate that exceeds the rollback tax rate."
We had to leave before Bonnen called us to testify, but considering we'd had a sharp exchange of views during the previous bill he knows why this authors supports this bill.
That being said, the most notable aspect of the testimony on this bill was that the local officials all showed up and lost their minds in opposition to this bill; had we been able to stick around, we would have pointed out to the chair that those people being that upset should tell you everything you need to know about which of his two bills would have had a greater impact.
It's also worth pointing out that Drew Springer and even one of the Democrats on the committee grew visibly exasperated with some of the disingenuous claims made by the local officials; we'll see what that means for getting this bill out of committee.
Bottom Line: We'll know how quickly these bills are moving in a couple days.
Labels:
85th Texas Legislature,
Carol Alvarado,
Democrats,
Dennis Bonnen,
Donna Howard,
Drew Darby,
Dwayne Bohac,
Education,
Greg Bonnen,
Land Use,
Paul Workman,
Property Taxes,
Spending,
Texas House
Monday, July 17, 2017
#TXLEGE: Today's TPPF #SpecialSession Policy Orientation
"Prepare yourself and be ready, you and all your companies that are gathered about you; and be a guard for them."
Ezekiel 38:7
TPPF hosted a supplemental policy orientation today with a mix of speakers and panels; the following is a direct transcription of our notes.
Governor Greg Abbott:
- Teachers are the most important part of the education process.
- Reward the best teachers.
- School finance -- What has been studied previously is not adequate.
- No more "band aids over band aids."
- End Robin Hood.
- Current education structure focuses on "schools, not students."
- Cities have enacted policies that are hostile to economic growth.
- "If we don't stop this, real quick, we are in real danger."
- Taxpayers should have a say in tax increases.
- #1 issue we must address.
- Private property rights are being diminished across Texas.
- "I want a vote" on union dues bill.
- Dallas mail in ballot fraud nothing new.
- Been going on since (at least) Lyndon Johnson.
- Removing paid political operatives from the process.
- Publishing lists of special session items re: who's supporting/who's not "on a daily basis."
Lt. Gov Dan Patrick:
- Points out Straus laying foundation for state income tax in the first paragraph.
- Along with Democrats and school district officials.
- 52% of budget goes to education.
- Teachers only get 32% of education $$$.
- "It's not an unfunded mandate...school districts need to re-purpose the money."
- Teachers unions oppose higher pay for teachers.
- Math is math.
- "Governor Abbott and I do not want Texas to become California or Illinois."
- "Greg Abbott's priorities are my priorities."
- Property taxes #1 priority.
- House has lots of members who will vote the right way "if they get the chance."
- "Texas likes fighters, not quitters."
- "We've shown that big government Republicans are wrong."
- re: Straus: "Don't undermine the entire party and the entire state."
![]() |
| From Left: Talmadge Heflin (TPPF), Sen. Kelly Hancock, Rep. Craig Goldman, Sen. Bryan Hughes, Patrick Gleason (ATR) |
State level fiscal policy panel:
- Statewide spending limits needs to go down to (population + inflation).
- Hancock: Abbott created conference committees before the bills were even filed.
- Public sector unions are bankrupting California.
- Hancock: Spending is where you control the growth of government.
- (Population + inflation) is a real cap.
- Note: As this session's budget can attest, (population + inflation) is more of a bare minimum than a real cap...but it would still be a significant improvement on the status quo.
- Gleason: It's easier to pass things in other states when Texas has done it.
- Gleason: Kansas cut taxes, but failed to keep spending in check.
![]() |
| From Left: Sen. Donna Campbell, Sen. Paul Bettencourt, Rep. Paul Workman |
Local Liberty Panel:
- Cities are doing power grabs to increase their tax base.
- Annexation: Cities have been unrestrained for decades.
- Campbell's bill expedites voluntary annexation.
- Texas is one of the last states in the country to permit voluntary annexation.
- Property Taxes: Revenue up >30% in all the major counties over the past few years.
- Anywhere you go in the state, appraisals are up at least 15% annually.
- School districts have to hold tax ratification elections past a certain threshold; you need a similar mechanism for cities and counties.
- Current rollback petition requirements "are fictitious nonsense."
- Rollback rates have been >5% since Jimmy Carter.
- Bettencourt supports 0% rollback rate but doesn't currently have the votes.
- Texas currently chasing New York and Illinois on property tax burdens.
- Tree Bill: Heritage trees add value to property, so cutting them down is rare, but in the cases where it's necessary it's none of the government's business.
- Westlake tried to fine a property owner $100k for cutting down a tree on his own property.
- Expedited Permitting: Workman's bill states that cities can have expedited permitting, but doesn't allow them to add strings to the process.
Monday, June 5, 2017
#TXLEGE: On the issues, grading the 85th (Regular Session Edition)....
"Therefore by their fruits you will know them."
Matthew 7:20
[Note: Our assessment of the 84th can be viewed here.]
It's that time of the political cycle! The regular session of the 85th Texas Legislature is over. How'd they do?!?
Border Security: B -- They passed the Sanctuary cities bill and maintained border security funding in the budget; if border security is one of your top issues, you can't deny that they made tangible progress on this issue this session.
But we've publicly stated doubts about whether the approach behind the sanctuary cities bill will ultimately accomplish it's stated objective, and we've found the discussion to be very theatrical.
In other words, they notched a couple of first downs but missed other opportunities to reach the end zone.
Pro-Life: B -- The top realistically achievable pro-life priority, the dismemberment abortion ban, was successful. In addition, we had a couple of pro-life victories in the budget. But we'll repeat what we said two years ago: "The only reason meaningful pro-Life legislation passed this session was the dogged and indefatigable work of Texas Right to Life."
Unfortunately, for no reason besides political spite, House leadership killed efforts to eliminate abortion subsidies in the health insurance market and to prohibit involuntary due not resuscitate orders in hospitals.
Finally, while it had no realistic path to 76 votes, for Byron Cook to kill the abolition bill without a hearing speaks for itself.
Austin Bashing: C -- The Uber bill crossed the finish line. On housing issues, they lost linkage fees. And it's not a secret that a number of local politicians have cynically grandstanded over sanctuary cities.
But the overwhelming majority of bills to reign in the City of Austin's abusive practices died in House committees chaired by Democrats. Pro-property rights bills related to historical zoning and short term rentals died in Carol Alvarado's Urban Affairs committee, while bills to stop micromanaging hiring practices and pre-empt tree cutting ordinances were slow walked in Rene Olivera's Business and Industry committee. Alvarado and Olivera killed several other bills without hearings. It's worth noting that none of Paul Workman's Austin bashing bills were successful.
Finally, an attempt to prohibit other forms of housing price controls died late in the Senate.
Religious Liberty: C -- Conscience protections for adoption service providers successfully passed and that's a pretty big deal. In addition, efforts to reign in some of the most abusive actions we saw in the 2014/15 Houston saga were successful. Both of those are fairly substantial victories.
But any number of other religious liberty bills died in the House.
It wasn't terrible, but it was underwhelming.
Higher Education: D [Note: Senate C, House F] -- The good news: The Senate passed strong bills on tuition and free speech. Unfortunately, both predictably died in the House. Nevertheless, those Senate bills are a solid foundation from which to build in future sessions.
The bad news: In the one place where the Senate had leverage and the House was irrelevant...the Senate rubber stamped the damn regent nominees. Thus, we expect the higher ed. status quo to continue in the short term. In addition, the Senate caved and increased higher ed. funding in the budget.
The only reason we're giving them a passing grade is because UT had to back down on the Houston land grab.
Ethics: D [Note: Senate A, House D] -- The first bill the Senate unanimously passed was an ethics bill that would have accomplished the following objectives: "barring politicians convicted of a felony from holding office or drawing a pension, requiring lawmakers to disclose government contracts, bond counsel, and legal referral fees, enacting more effective disclosure of lobbyist wining and dining of legislators, and banning elected officials from being employed as lobbyists while in office and eliminating the “revolving door” by adding a one session cooling-off period before former lawmakers can become lobbyists." In addition, the Senate began the process of reigning in taxpayer funded lobbying. Over the course of this session we have become convinced that eliminating taxpayer funded lobbying is, by far, the most important ethics reform the legislature could make.
Unfortunately, the only parts of that package that survived the House were the parts about barring pensions for convicted felons and a watered down form of contract disclosure.
Finally, it's worth noting the degree to which the House has treated Greg Abbott with contempt over this topic. For the past two sessions, the Guvnah has made ethics reform an emergency item, to only receive the crumbs from House leadership we detailed in the preceding paragraph. That Abbott won't even fight for his own stated priorities is quite revealing.
Two Year Budget: D -- We said our piece about the budget two weeks ago but the TL,DR version is that the this budget met the bare minimum standard (kept the top line number under inflation+population growth) but went no further and funded a lot of garbage.
Tax Relief: F [Note: Senate B, House F] In one of the highest profile discussions of the session, the Senate passed a bill that would have begun the process of structurally reforming the property tax system; the Senate bill didn't go far enough, but it was a fairly significant step in the right direction.
Unfortunately, due to a combination of incompetence and mendacity from Ways and Means chairman Dennis Bonnen, that effort collapsed in the House; we detailed Dennis Bonnen's debacle in real time.
They didn't even get margins tax elimination across the finish line.
Second Amendment: F -- Constitutional carry remains undone. Mom's Demand Action bragged about having a successful session. Case closed.
Education: F [Note: Senate A-, House F] -- While they had to modestly water it down to get to 19 votes, the Senate passed the strongest parental educational choice bill the legislature has ever considered.
In the House, Chairman Dan Huberty thumbed his nose at the Republican party platform and killed parental choice. The House followed up with a budget vote that further illustrated their loyalty to government bureaucrats over parents and children. Huberty also attempted to use a shady process to pass a "school finance" bill that would have accomplished little besides pouring additional money into the same failing system.
The only silver lining is that when the school finance bill made it to the Senate, they rewrote it in a way that might point the way towards a long term compromise.
"Fit hits the Shan" Preparation: F -- For as little as was getting done this session, we thought there was a decent chance grid security could pass, but it ultimately didn't; right to use cash legislation and the Texas Sovereignty act similarly died.
Structural Fiscal Reforms: F [Note: Senate A, House F] -- For future state budgets, the Senate passed a strong spending limit bill in late March.
In addition, the Senate took a hard look at various corporate welfare programs, 'economic development' shenanigans at the local level, and ballot integrity for local bond elections; these are a strong foundation on which to build future efforts.
None of these efforts went anywhere in the House.
Transportation: Incomplete -- As far as we can tell they didn't do anything terrible (though they tried), but neither did they do anything particularly good.
Overall, we would give the Senate a B and the House an F.
Bottom Line: The good news is that most of the bad stuff died; the bad news is that most of the good stuff also died.
Friday, March 24, 2017
Bonnen hears (at least) NINE (more) special interest carve out bills (23 for session)....
"Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord,
But a just weight is His delight."
Proverbs 11:1
It's that time of week when we check on the latest from Dennis Bonnen and the Texas House Ways and Means committee:
- HB 382 Murphy
| et al.
Relating to the exemption from ad valorem taxation of real property leased to and used by certain schools.
- HB 589 Bohac
Relating to a sales tax exemption for certain items sold during a limited period.
- HB 595 Workman
| et al.
Relating to a franchise tax credit for entities that employ certain students in certain paid internship or similar programs.
- HB 755 Parker
Relating to the use by certain tax-exempt organizations of certain payments made in connection with real property transfers to provide educational activities through certain schools.
- HB 1127 Raymond
| et al.
Relating to a franchise tax credit pilot program for taxable entities that employ certain apprentices.
- HB 1351 Wray
Relating to the prohibition of local motor fuel taxes on compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas.
- HB 2028 Goldman
Relating to the procedure for canceling a deferral or abatement of collection of ad valorem taxes on the residence homestead of an elderly person.
- HB 2381 Frullo
Relating to the applicability of the sales and use tax to certain insurance services.
- HJR 52 Turner
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation a portion of the assessed value of certain real property used to provide housing to certain individuals with disabilities.
Friday, February 19, 2016
Wiley needs volunteers to work polling locations!!!
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2
Truthfully, there are probably a lot of campaigns that need this, but we just got the following e-mail from Jay Wiley's campaign coordinator:
If anyone can hand out pushcards and/or wave a sign for any amount of time on Saturday or Sunday it would be a huge help.
Please let me know if you are able and willing to help with this! Here is the link to the map of the polls again:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewerhl=en_US&mid=zH8VFmh97Uhc.k07ACprt4zSY
And here is the link to sign up for a time slot, or if you'd like, simply reply to this email with what you are able to do and I'll plug you in. I will get pushcards and signs to anyone who needs them!
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DGkx4PRmIzjAH34FeXj95FQdteWF5gIWpZn49E8nF0I/edit?usp=sharing
Let me know if you have any questions/comments/concerns. We do still need people to stand at the polls during the week days till the 26th, and we very much need people standing out here on Election Day, but right now this weekend is the priority.
Thank you all so much! Election Day is so close, we can taste it! This is an exciting time, what we've all been preparing for, and every little bit of help goes a long way. We appreciate you all so much.
Thursday, February 11, 2016
JAY WILEY faces down incumbent in HD-47 Debate!!
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan."
Proverbs 29:2
Jay Wiley and Paul Workman held their first debate on the Trailer Park Show this past Monday:
Highlights:
Workman opening:
- 911 service district
- Named dropped a bunch of obscure local bills
- Convention of States.
- Wants to end sanctuary cities next session.
- Author's Note: Ignores the fact that he's had three sessions to do so.
- Property tax Appraisal reform
- Author's Note: Ignores the fact that House leadership killed appraisal reform last session.
Wiley opening:
- Started reading Goldwater at 13.
- Phil Gramm mentee.
- TPPF
- Workman's amnesty bill
Workman - "Stalwart" on border security
Wiley - Texas can start a guest worker program, which Workman tried to do.
Education:
Workman - As much Parental choice as possible.
Wiley - Choice "as close to a magic bullet as we're going to get.
Black outreach:
Wiley - Economic liberty is for everyone
- Not "interested in little groups."
- Inspire people and multiply forces
Workman - RPT has an outreach director.
Top Issues:
Wiley - Property tax relief
- Only Travis County Republican should HAMMER property taxes.
- Hits Workman over the House's sales tax bs from last session.
- Appraisal reform and abolish property taxes over the long run.
- Sales taxes fairer than property taxes.
Workman - Water and Transportation (ie. Lobby issues)
Wiley - Straus isn't interested in property tax relief.
- Simple Budget Reforms: Constitutional spending limits and zero based budgeting.
Relationships with other members;
Workman - Passing bills is "a lot of work."
Wiley - Grassroots coalition leaning on members.
Pot Legalization:
Wiley - Supports Medical and decriminalization.
Workman - "Absolutely opposed" "an awful idea."
Illegal Immigration:
Wiley - Enforce the law
Workman - Accuses Wiley of "wanting to load them up on busses."
Toll Roads:
Wiley - Opposed
Workman - For
Wiley: "If you're happy with your property tax bill, vote for the incumbent"
Monday, February 8, 2016
Don't Like Toll Roads?!? VOTE JAY WILEY!!!
"Bread gained by deceit is sweet to a man,
But afterward his mouth will be filled with gravel."
Proverbs 20:17
Well, THAT'S Interesting:
Fiscal responsibility is the cornerstone of our campaign for Texas House. That's why anti-toll groups Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom (TURF) and Texans for Toll-free Highways (TTH) have announced their endorsement of my candidacy.
My opponent Paul Workman has been a strong and vocal advocate of toll roads.
TURF is a non-partisan, grassroots, all-volunteer group defending citizens' concerns with toll road policy, public private partnerships, and eminent domain abuse. TURF promotes pro-taxpayer, pro-freedom, & non-toll transportation solutions.
Similarly, Texans for Toll-free Highways is a non-partisan political action committee also working to keep our highways toll-free.
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
What do PAUL WORKMAN and DONALD TRUMP have in common?!?
"Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord,
But a just weight is His delight."
Proverbs 11:1
Apparently, they both give money to Democrats to "get things done" for their businesses:
DID YOU KNOW: Paul Workman has supported Democrats for years. From Politifact: "The Texas Ethics Commission's campaign...
Posted by Jay Wiley on Monday, January 18, 2016
Thursday, January 14, 2016
Jay Wiley on Property Taxes
"But the former governors who were before me laid burdens on the people, and took from them bread and wine, besides forty shekels of silver. Yes, even their servants bore rule over the people, but I did not do so, because of the fear of God."
Nehemiah 5:15
Given the lukewarm comments on property tax relief the incumbent made earlier today, it's worth reviewing Jay Wiley's positions on property tax relief:
Eliminating Property Taxes = Economic GrowthBottom Line: To see meaningful property tax relief, you need to elect a critical mass of legislators who are more interested in representing their constituents than appeasing taxpayer-funded lobbyists; in HD-47 that candidate is clearly Jay Wiley.
Texas has one of the most burdensome property tax systems in the nation. Ever-increasing tax assessments have forced many Texans from their homes, led to costly lawsuits against assessment formulations, and is a complex mess that few people actually understand. Property taxes compel homeowners to effectively lease their own homes from the government.
Our property taxes are based on an imagined, or assessed, value of our home. Instead, a better system would be to tax the actual transaction price of the property when it is sold. This would remove the prospect of taxing homeowners out of their home through radically increasing assessments. This also eliminates the need for the 254 separate appraisal districts in Texas and their thousands of employees.
Texas should lower down our current property tax and eventually replace it with a small, understandable consumption, or sales, tax. Some of the most recognized economists in the country have estimated that such a replacement, dollar for dollar, would increase Texans’ personal income between 1.8% and 4.7% and trigger a net gain of hundreds of thousands of new jobs.
Economic growth is encouraged when the burden of supporting state government is lifted from homeowners and broadened to include everyone in Texas through the goods and services we all buy. Taxes are healthier and more fair when tied to economic activity and consumers’ ability to pay, instead of imaginary assessed value of a fixed asset.
Last legislative session, Paul Workman sided with Democrats and big government Republicans against providing property tax relief for homeowners until the pressure from conservatives became unbearable. We need conservative leadership with bold new ideas and the courage to fight for them.
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
Workman FLIP-FLOPS; will now DEBATE Wiley
"So then, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth."
Revelation 3:16
[Author's Note: Readers can familiarize themselves with the relevant recent history here.]
Well, we suppose that's progress:
As the only Republican State Representative elected from Travis County, I am used to taking on the liberal Democrat machine. And just as I am proud to stand up to liberal Austin (*), I am proud to stand up and defend my conservative record. That’s why I have agreed to participate in at least two debates. The details will be finalized after the filing period closes and all candidates for this race have been announced.According to the Latino Limbaugh, at least one of those debates will take place on an upcoming Trailer Park Show:
Bottom Line: Good for Workman for changing his mind (we suppose), but the fact that we had to pull teeth to get him to appear in the first place epitomizes Paul Workman's lukewarm representation over the past half-decade....James Ritter and I are proud to announce that we are in the process of having a Workman-Wiley debate on The Trailer Park Show! The Workman campaign has agreed in principle to have the debate moderated my Michael Lee, James, and myself. We will work out the final details with both Workman and Wiley on this.
-----
* -- While we're on the subject of standing "up to liberal Austin," we'll simply point out that Jay Wiley was a vocal opponent of the recent Courthouse Bond while Paul Workman was conspicuously silent.
Friday, December 4, 2015
Workman DUCKING Wiley
"Therefore by their fruits you will know them."
Matthew 7:20
[Author's Note: The audio track isn't very good, you might need to crank up your speakers or use headphones to hear it properly.]
OUCH:
Paul Workman Refuses to Debate
Paul Workman refuses to debate.
Posted by Jay Wiley on Thursday, December 3, 2015
Highlights:
- President of the Republican Club of Austin wanted to schedule a debate between the two candidates.
- Workman refused to even discuss the issue and walked away.
- "I think it's a shame that we have a state representative unwilling to discuss the issues in a debate format."
Monday, November 9, 2015
CLARIFICATION: Wiley, Workman, and Houston
"Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord,"
Acts 3:19
We need to offer a partial correction to something we reported Saturday. Paul Workman endorsed repealing the Houston Bathroom ordinance in the middle of the day on Tuesday, NOT Wednesday morning as we originally reported. Cahnman's Musings apologizes for the sloppy reporting.
Around 9AM, the Campaign for Houston posted a list (subsequently deleted) of elected officials and candidates who supported repeal of the bathroom ordinance. Paul Workman's name wasn't there. This is the list Jay Wiley posted to his Facebook page at 9:14AM:
Proud to be listed as one of the candidates opposing Houston's Prop 1, the Bathroom Ordinance that would allow men into women's restrooms.
Posted by Jay Wiley on Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Likewise, HD-128 candidate Briscoe Cain posted the same list to his Facebook page:
Proud to be listed on this statewide slate of Republicans supporting Texas Values.
Posted by Briscoe Cain on Tuesday, November 3, 2015
At 12:12 PM, Campaign for Houston posted an updated list to their Facebook page that included Paul Workman (this was the list that Workman eventually published to his FB page):
Meet the local elected officials who are taking a stand against Proposition 1, The Bathroom Ordinance!Make sure you...
Posted by Campaign For Houston on Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Most likely, this means Workman had his name added to the list between 9AM and Noon on election day; the irony of the move occurring at literally the eleventh hour does not escape us.
Bottom Line: On Saturday, we incorrectly reported the timing of Paul Workman's actions regarding the Houston bathroom ordinance. For that, we apologize. Nonetheless, jumping on a bandwagon at the last minute isn't impressive....
Saturday, November 7, 2015
Workman's AFTER THE FACT flip-flop on Houston Bathroom Ordinance
"You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons"
1 Corinthians 10:21
[UPDATE: As it turns out, Workman actually endorsed the repeal vote on Tuesday afternoon, not Wednesday morning. For that we apologize, though we hasten to add that it doesn't change the fact that Workman only hopped on the repeal bandwagon at the last minute. We've written a more complete explanation here.]
On Tuesday evening, the Houston Bathroom ordinance lost in a landslide; on Wednesday afternoon, Paul Workman posted the following to his Facebook page:
Conservatives scored a major victory last night with the resounding defeat of Houston's Proposition 1 at the ballot box....
Posted by Paul Workman on Wednesday, November 4, 2015
You'll notice that Workman's post appeared NOT ONLY after the votes had been counted, but in the middle of the afternoon?!? We wonder why. That MORNING, Jay Wiley (who put his name on the line before the election) had pointed out:
Stood with conservatives from all over Texas, including a majority of House Republicans, to defeat the Houston transgender bathroom ordinance yesterday. Where was Paul Workman??
Posted by Jay Wiley on Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Do we need to say anything else?!?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






















